HomeThe TreatiseChaptersChapter 12
Section 2DiagnosisChapter 12 of 109

History and Physical Examination of the Spine

Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the official printed edition of the Treatise.
Capa 3D Tratado de Coluna

Chapter Clinical Summary

Academic synthesis, diagnostic methodology, and surgical recommendations
Clinical Context

The comprehensive evaluation of a patient presenting with spinal complaints begins well before reviewing neuroimaging studies. Formulating a precise clinical differential diagnosis before analyzing radiographic images prevents the common pitfall of treating incidental, asymptomatic imaging abnormalities (such as disc bulges or asymptomatic herniations found in up to 30–50% of healthy individuals). Axial back/neck pain, radiating radicular pain, progressive spinal deformity, and functional disability constitute the cardinal complaints, but each requires meticulous characterization regarding onset, duration, mechanical versus inflammatory features, red flags (fever, unexplained weight loss, nocturnal unremitting pain, history of malignancy, progressive neurological deficit), yellow flags (psychosocial distress, maladaptive illness behavior), and impact on activities of daily living. Physical examination must be global and systematic: inspecting posture, sagittal/coronal alignment, gait dynamics, skin stigmata, and pelvic/hip joints (hip-spine syndrome); performing targeted segmental motor (myotomes 0–5 MRC scale), sensory (dermatomes light touch and pinprick), and reflex testing (deep tendon reflexes, pathologic upper motor neuron signs like Babinski, Hoffmann, clonus); and conducting validated provocative orthopedic maneuvers (Spurling, Lhermitte, straight leg raise [Lasègue], femoral nerve stretch, Patrick FABER). In trauma, immediate life support is accompanied by standardized neurological assessment adhering strictly to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI/ASIA scale).

Chapter Objective

To teach a comprehensive, reproducible, and structured sequence for the clinical and neurological examination of the spine. The reader should be able to conduct a targeted medical history; distinguish mechanical from neuropathic, vascular, and inflammatory pain patterns; evaluate spinal alignment, flexibility, and deformity; perform accurate segmental neurological examination (myotomes, dermatomes, reflexes); interpret validated cervical, lumbar, and sacroiliac provocative maneuvers; identify non-organic signs (Waddell signs); and apply standardized trauma examination principles including the ASIA impairment scale.

Clinical History and Pain Patterns

History taking begins with patient demographics, chief complaint, occupational and athletic demands, and detailed characterization of pain using the OPQRST mnemonic (Onset, Provocation/Palliation, Quality, Region/Radiation, Severity, Timing). Pain patterns must be differentiated: 1) Mechanical axial pain (aggravated by loading/motion, relieved by rest); 2) Radicular neuropathic pain (sharp, shooting, dermatomal radiation below the knee or elbow, associated with paresthesias); 3) Neurogenic claudication (buttock/thigh/calf cramping and heaviness provoked by walking and spinal extension, relieved by lumbar flexion/sitting—"shopping cart sign"); 4) Vascular claudication (fixed walking distance, relieved promptly by standing still, accompanied by diminished peripheral pulses and trophic skin changes); 5) Inflammatory pain (morning stiffness >30–60 min, improves with exercise, nocturnal awakening). Screen systematically for "Red Flags" (neoplasm, infection, fracture, cauda equina syndrome) and "Yellow Flags" (catastrophizing, depression, disability litigation).

Inspection, Palpation, and Range of Motion

Examination begins the moment the patient enters the room, assessing antalgic posturing, assistive devices, and gait dynamics (trendelenburg gait, steppage gait, spastic hemiparetic or scissoring gait, myelopathic broad-based ataxic gait). Spine inspection in standing position evaluates coronal plumb line balance (C7 plumb line over gluteal cleft), sagittal balance, shoulder level, pelvic obliquity, scapular asymmetry, and rib hump prominence on Adam's forward bend test (quantified with a Scoliometer). Palpate spinous processes for focal tenderness, step-off deformities (spondylolisthesis), and paraspinal muscle spasm. Measure active cervical and thoracolumbar range of motion in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

Segmental Neurological Examination

Neurological localization requires rigorous assessment of motor, sensory, and reflex function: 1) Motor testing (0–5 Medical Research Council scale): C5 (deltoid/biceps), C6 (wrist extensors), C7 (triceps/wrist flexors), C8 (finger flexors), T1 (finger abductors), L2 (hip flexors), L3 (quadriceps), L4 (tibialis anterior/ankle dorsiflexion), L5 (extensor hallucis longus), S1 (gastrocnemius-soleus/plantarflexion); 2) Sensory testing: key dermatomal points from C2 to S4–S5 (light touch and pinprick); 3) Deep tendon reflexes: biceps (C5), brachioradialis (C6), triceps (C7), patellar (L4), Achilles (S1); and 4) Upper motor neuron/myelopathic signs: Hoffmann sign, inverted radial reflex, hyperreflexia, sustained ankle clonus (>3 beats), and Babinski sign.

Special Provocative Tests and Hip-Spine Differential

Cervical tests: Spurling test (axial compression with ipsilateral neck extension and rotation, highly specific for cervical radiculopathy), shoulder abduction relief test (Bakody sign), neck distraction test, and Lhermitte sign (electric shock sensation down spine on flexion, indicating dorsal column pathology/myelopathy). Lumbar tests: Straight Leg Raise (SLR/Lasègue test: positive if radiating dermatomal pain reproduced between 30° and 70° of hip flexion), Bragard test (SLR + ankle dorsiflexion), Crossed Lasègue test (high specificity for herniated disc), and Femoral Nerve Stretch test (prone knee flexion, testing L2–L4 nerve roots). Evaluate the sacroiliac joint and hip to differentiate spine from hip pathology (hip-spine syndrome): Patrick FABER test, Gaenslen test, and hip internal/external rotation.

Spinal Cord Injury and ASIA Assessment

In acute trauma, vital stabilization (ATLS protocol) precedes spinal clearance. Document baseline neurological status using the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI/ASIA): test 10 key motor muscle groups bilaterally (motor score 0–100), 28 key sensory dermatomes bilaterally for pinprick and light touch (sensory score 0–112 each), and perform digital rectal examination to determine sacral sparing (deep anal pressure [DAP] and voluntary anal contraction [VAC]). Sacral sparing defines an incomplete spinal cord injury (ASIA B, C, or D) versus complete injury (ASIA A), establishing fundamental prognostic expectations for functional recovery.

Clinical Application & Guidance

In routine outpatient practice, the clinical examination directs the diagnostic workup, preventing over-interpretation of incidental degenerative imaging findings. A patient with severe back pain and a large L4–L5 disc herniation on MRI whose neurological exam is completely normal and whose Lasègue test is negative is suffering from axial pain, not compressive radiculopathy, requiring conservative therapy rather than discectomy. Conversely, recognizing hyperreflexia, Hoffmann sign, and an ataxic gait in a patient presenting with vague hand numbness correctly diagnoses cervical spondylotic myelopathy, mandating urgent cervical decompression. In trauma, documenting sacral sparing (presence of voluntary anal contraction or deep anal sensation) is decisive: it proves an incomplete spinal cord injury with significant potential for neurological recovery, guiding aggressive surgical decompression and blood pressure augmentation protocols.

DeCS / MeSH Scientific Descriptors

Medical History TakingPhysical ExaminationSpineNeurologic ExaminationSpinal Cord InjuriesRadiculopathyReflex, AbnormalPain Measurement

Why this chapter matters

Radiographic abnormalities are pervasive in asymptomatic individuals, while disabling neurological deficits may initially reveal themselves only through an altered gait, a lost reflex, or subtle focal weakness. This chapter teaches the clinician to construct the diagnosis from the patient rather than the scan. By integrating pain patterns, deformity, hip-spine evaluation, non-organic behavioral signs, and standardized ASIA trauma assessment, the clinician avoids inappropriate surgeries, identifies urgent red flags, and ensures safe, targeted care.

History taking and physical examination are the foundational pillars of spine diagnosis. Neuroimaging confirms or refutes clinical hypotheses, but can never replace meticulous pain characterization, comprehensive inspection, motion analysis, and segmental neurological localization. In trauma, systematic documentation of sacral sparing and ASIA classification is indispensable for precise diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic guidance.
Card 1 — Core Concept

Formulate the Diagnosis Before Imaging

Asymptomatic disc herniations and spinal stenosis are present in up to 30–50% of healthy individuals. Always formulate a clinical hypothesis based on history, dermatomal mapping, and physical examination before ordering and reviewing neuroimaging to avoid operating on incidental findings.

Card 2 — Clinical Decision

Differentiate Hip from Spine Pathology

Groin pain aggravated by hip internal rotation suggests hip osteoarthritis, whereas buttock/thigh pain provoked by walking and relieved by sitting points to lumbar spinal stenosis (hip-spine syndrome). Perform Patrick FABER and hip range-of-motion tests routinely.

Card 3 — Key Pearl / Warning

Sacral Sparing Dictates Trauma Prognosis

In acute spinal cord trauma, digital rectal examination assessing deep anal sensation (DAP) and voluntary anal contraction (VAC) is mandatory. Preservation of sacral function defines an incomplete spinal cord injury (ASIA B, C, or D), indicating substantial potential for functional recovery.

Selected Bibliographic References

High-impact peer-reviewed literature indexed on PubMed / DOI
13 References
1.As referências foram mantidas na ordem e com a numeração apresentadas no capítulo. A pontuação e a disposição foram uniformizadas segundo o estilo Vancouver, sem completar por suposição informações ausentes.
2.Barros Filho TEP, Lech O. Exame físico em ortopedia. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2001.
3.Bridwell KH, Dewald RL, editors. The textbook of spinal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
Videocast SBC
Watch Videocast
Treatise in Debate • Videocast

Episode 1 – Chapter 8: Sagittal Plane Spinal Alignment

Deepen your understanding through clinical debates with the chapter authors discussing complex case studies and surgical workflows.