HomeThe TreatiseChaptersChapter 48
Section 5Degenerative DiseasesChapter 48 of 109

Cervical Stenosis, Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, and OPLL

Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the official printed edition of the Treatise.
Capa 3D Tratado de Coluna

Chapter Clinical Summary

Academic synthesis, diagnostic methodology, and surgical recommendations
Clinical Context

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) represents the leading cause of progressive nontraumatic spinal cord dysfunction in adults worldwide. Disc degeneration, spondylotic osteophytosis, facet arthrosis, ligamentum flavum buckling, dynamic hypermobility, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) progressively narrow the cervical canal reserve. The pathophysiology combines static compressive forces, dynamic injury during flexion-extension, and secondary ischemic microvascular and histopathological cord damage. Clinical diagnosis is frequently delayed because early symptoms—subtle loss of hand dexterity, buttoning difficulty, mild paresthesias, or discreet gait imbalance—are easily misattributed to normal aging or peripheral neuropathies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential to detect cord compression and intramedullary signal changes; however, radiographic stenosis is also prevalent in asymptomatic individuals, making comprehensive neurological examination mandatory. Functional scoring systems (mJOA, Nurick) standardize severity assessment. Management depends on myelopathy severity, progression rate, number of stenotic levels, sagittal alignment (lordosis vs kyphosis), compression location (anterior vs posterior), and, in OPLL, specific morphology and dural ossification.

Chapter Objective

To elucidate the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of DCM, achieve early recognition of compressive cervical myelopathy, apply validated clinical scoring scales (mJOA, Nurick) and multi-modality imaging, understand the classification and surgical implications of OPLL (K-line), and select anterior, posterior, or combined surgical approaches based on compression geometry, level span, and sagittal alignment.

Static compression, dynamic strain, and neural ischemia

The chapter structures DCM pathophysiology into three interacting pillars: static structural stenosis, repetitive dynamic flexion-extension strain, and secondary spinal cord ischemia. This multi-hit model explains why resting static MRI alone does not reflect the total physiological burden on the cord.

Clinical diagnosis begins with manual and gait function

Loss of fine motor dexterity, clumsiness when buttoning shirts, handwriting changes, gait unsteadiness, hyperreflexia, clonus, Hoffmann's sign, and Babinski responses are cardinal findings. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) and Nurick scoring scales (Tables 48.1 and 48.2) document severity and monitor progression. Figure 48.4 details key neurological exam maneuvers.

Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL)

OPLL presents distinct continuous, segmental, mixed, and focal morphological types (Figure 48.1) and frequently associates with dural ossification ('double-layer sign', Figure 48.2). The K-line concept (Figure 48.3) integrates sagittal alignment and ossification prominence to predict whether posterior decompression alone can achieve sufficient indirect cord drift.

Diagnostic imaging

Plain radiographs assess cervical lordosis and mobility. CT excels at mapping ossified masses in OPLL and canal geometry. MRI evaluates cord effacement and intramedullary T2/T1 signal alterations. Dynamic flexion-extension MRI (Figure 48.10) can unmask position-dependent cord compression missed on neutral scans.

Surgical strategy tailored to alignment and anatomy

Moderate-to-severe myelopathy (mJOA < 15) and progressive clinical decline mandate surgical decompression. Mild cases may be monitored under close surveillance in select patients. Anterior approaches (ACDF, ACCF), posterior laminectomy with fusion, expansive laminoplasty, and circumferential reconstructions each offer distinct profiles. Multi-level involvement, anterior versus posterior compression, sagittal lordosis vs kyphosis, and K-line status dictate the optimal corridor.

Clinical Application & Guidance

In clinical practice, any patient presenting with dropped objects, deteriorating handwriting, difficulty fastening buttons, or unexplained gait stiffness warrants immediate evaluation for DCM, even if neck pain is completely absent. A normal sensory exam or concurrent polyneuropathy does not rule out spinal cord compression. MRI demonstrates cord effacement and T2 hyperintensity; high-resolution CT is mandatory if OPLL is suspected to map dural ossification and prevent catastrophic CSF fistulas. When deciding between anterior and posterior surgery, spinal alignment is decisive: posterior laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion relies on posterior cord drift, which requires preserved cervical lordosis and a K-line positive configuration. In cervical kyphosis or K-line negative OPLL, the cord remains tented over anterior compressive masses after posterior decompression, necessitating anterior corpectomy (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), or circumferential reconstruction.

DeCS / MeSH Scientific Descriptors

Spinal Cord CompressionCervical VertebraeSpinal StenosisOssification of Posterior Longitudinal LigamentMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedLaminoplastySpinal Fusion

Why this chapter matters

Diagnostic delays in DCM often lead to permanent tetraplegia, loss of ambulation, and sphincter incontinence. Conversely, finding cervical stenosis on MRI in a healthy person does not justify surgery. This chapter integrates functional neurological scoring, K-line alignment analysis, and OPLL imaging to guide timely and safe surgical decompression.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy is a progressive clinical syndrome resulting from cord compression, dynamic strain, and ischemia. Early diagnosis prevents irreversible neurological loss. MRI details the spinal cord, while CT maps bony geometry and OPLL. Surgical approach selection (anterior, posterior, or combined) must be tailored to the number of levels, compression location, sagittal alignment, and K-line status rather than arbitrary surgical habit.
Card 1 — Core Concept

Myelopathy Begins Subtly

Deteriorating handwriting, dropped objects, and mild gait stiffness frequently precede severe neurological deficits. The absence of severe neck pain must never lower clinical suspicion for cervical myelopathy.

Card 2 — Clinical Decision

Alignment Chooses the Surgical Corridor

Number of levels is only one factor. Compressive location, cervical lordosis vs kyphosis, and K-line status determine whether an anterior, posterior (laminoplasty/fusion), or combined strategy achieves true decompression.

Card 3 — Pearl / Alert

OPLL Requires Dedicated Planning

Ossification morphology, dural involvement ('double-layer sign'), and K-line orientation fundamentally alter indirect decompression efficacy and CSF leak risks. OPLL cannot be managed as simple spondylotic stenosis.

Selected Bibliographic References

High-impact peer-reviewed literature indexed on PubMed / DOI
38 References
1.McCormick WE, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: make the difficult diagnosis, then refer for surgery. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003;70(10):899-904.
2.Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Benjamin Davies, Nanna-Lohkamp L, Garwood P, Martin AR et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis. Global Spine J. 2022;12(8):1881-93.
3.Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2015;40(12):E675-E693.
Videocast SBC
Watch Videocast
Treatise in Debate • Videocast

Episode 1 – Chapter 8: Sagittal Plane Spinal Alignment

Deepen your understanding through clinical debates with the chapter authors discussing complex case studies and surgical workflows.