Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 15
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 2 • Diagnosis
Chapter15

Diagnostic Imaging of the Spine

Vancouver: Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Alves GNL📖 Pages: 201-214
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 2Diagnosis
Cap. 15Clinical Chapter
2authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Diagnostic imaging modalities of the vertebral column address distinct clinical questions and must be selected based on the target anatomical tissue, functional weight-bearing status, and pre-test clinical hypothesis. Plain radiographs remain indispensable as the primary weight-bearing investigation to demonstrate overall spinal alignment, degenerative instability on dynamic flexion-extension views, and global spinopelvic parameters. Computed tomography (CT) provides superior multiplanar resolution of osseous architecture, cortical breaches, osteolysis, pars defects, facet arthrosis, vacuum phenomena (gas), and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) without anatomical overlap. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for evaluating neural structures (spinal cord, conus medullaris, cauda equina, exiting nerve roots), intervertebral disc morphology, bone marrow edema, soft-tissue collections, spinal infections (spondylodiscitis), and epidural tumors. Ultrasonography finds focused application in neonatal spinal dysraphism screening and image-guided interventional procedures. Bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT detect altered osteoblastic turnover in facet arthropathy, active spondylolysis, pseudarthrosis, and metastatic disease. A fundamental clinical challenge is avoiding both the inappropriate selection of imaging modalities and the over-interpretation of incidental findings: asymptomatic disc bulges, degenerative Modic endplate changes, facet arthrosis, and benign vertebral hemangiomas are highly prevalent in healthy populations. Imaging findings must always be correlated strictly with the patient’s clinical history and neurological examination.
• Chapter Objective: To present the principles, indications, diagnostic strengths, and limitations of major spine imaging modalities (radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, nuclear medicine) across degenerative disc disease, canal stenosis, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), ankylosing spondylitis, spinal infections, acute trauma, and incidental findings. The reader should be able to select the optimal imaging modality, recognize characteristic imaging patterns, determine when intravenous contrast or dynamic views are required, and correlate radiographic findings with clinical pathology.
• Modalities: Radiography, CT, MRI, and ScintigraphyPlain radiographs (AP, lateral, obliques, dynamic flexion-extension) evaluate alignment, disc height loss, osteophytes, and dynamic spondylolisthesis (>3–4 mm translation or >10° angular motion). Multi-detector CT provides sub-millimeter isotropic osseous detail, indispensable for complex fractures, surgical instrumentation planning, and pseudarthrosis assessment. MRI utilizes T1-weighted (anatomical detail, fatty marrow), T2-weighted (CSF, disc hydration, cord edema, stenosis), STIR/T2 fat-suppressed (bone marrow edema, acute fractures, active inflammation), and gadolinium-enhanced T1 sequences (differentiating recurrent disc herniation from epidural scar, vascular malformations, tumors, and epidural abscesses).
• Degenerative Cascade, Modic Changes, and StenosisMRI readily depicts the degenerative cascade (Pfirrmann grading of disc degeneration 1–5). Modic endplate classifications reflect vertebral marrow changes: Type 1 (inflammatory/vascular edema, hypointense on T1, hyperintense on T2/STIR, highly correlated with active axial pain); Type 2 (fatty conversion, hyperintense on T1 and T2); Type 3 (sclerosis, hypointense on T1 and T2). Spinal canal and neural foraminal stenosis are categorized qualitatively and quantitatively (Schizas classification for lumbar central stenosis, Lee classification for foraminal stenosis) based on CSF obliteration, root compression, and epidural fat loss.
• DISH and Axial Spondyloarthritis (Ankylosing Spondylitis)Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH / Forestier disease) is defined radiographically by flowing anterolateral ossification spanning at least four contiguous vertebral bodies, preservation of disc height, and absence of sacroiliitis. Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) features early bilateral symmetric sacroiliitis, squaring of vertebral bodies, Romanus lesions (shiny corners), Andersson lesions (inflammatory discitis), and thin, delicate syndesmophytes producing a "bamboo spine." Both conditions create a rigid, long-lever arm spine highly susceptible to catastrophic, highly unstable extension-distraction fractures after trivial trauma.
• Spinal Infections: Spondylodiscitis vs. TuberculosisPyogenic spondylodiscitis characteristically demonstrates early T2/STIR hyperintensity and post-contrast enhancement of the intervertebral disc and adjacent subchondral vertebral endplates, with rapid disc space collapse and endplate erosion. In contrast, tuberculous spondylodiscitis (Pott disease) frequently spares the intervertebral disc initially, involves multiple contiguous or non-contiguous vertebral bodies, causes extensive anterior subligamentous spread, large calcified cold paraspinal/psoas abscesses, and profound angular kyphotic collapse (gibbus deformity).
• Trauma Evaluation and Incidental FindingsIn acute trauma, whole-spine CT is the primary modality to identify fracture lines, retropulsed fragments, and facet dislocations. MRI is mandatory to evaluate spinal cord compression, intramedullary contusion/hemorrhage (presaging poor neurological recovery), and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) disruption, which determines surgical instability under AO Spine and TLICS classifications. Incidental benign findings—such as typical vertebral hemangiomas (corduroy cloth appearance on coronal CT, hyperintense on T1 and T2) and Tarlov cysts—must be recognized to prevent unnecessary biopsies or surgeries.
• Clinical Application: In clinical practice, imaging must always be guided by the clinical question. In suspected mechanical instability or spondylolisthesis, weight-bearing dynamic flexion-extension radiographs are essential because supine MRI can mask significant translational instability. In suspected cauda equina syndrome, cervical myelopathy, or epidural abscess, emergent MRI (with contrast for infection/tumor) is the modality of choice. In patients with previous spine surgery presenting with recurrent leg pain, gadolinium-enhanced MRI differentiates non-enhancing avascular recurrent disc herniation from diffusely enhancing vascularized epidural scar tissue. In rigid spine patients (ankylosing spondylitis or DISH) presenting with new back pain following minor falls, thin-cut CT of the entire spine is mandatory, as lethal transdiscal/transvertebral fractures are frequently missed on plain radiographs. Recognizing that Modic 1 changes represent active inflammatory remodeling helps guide targeted non-operative and interventional therapies.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
Diagnostic ImagingRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpineIntervertebral Disc DegenerationSpinal StenosisSpondylodiscitis
⭐

Why this chapter matters

Selecting the wrong imaging study can obscure the exact pathology being sought: dynamic instability disappears in supine MRI, osseous bridging in pseudarthrosis is unresolvable on plain radiographs, and life-threatening fractures in ankylosing spondylitis are invisible on standard X-rays. Conversely, over-interpreting incidental MRI abnormalities leads to unnecessary patient anxiety and inappropriate surgical interventions. This chapter equips the clinician to select the most appropriate imaging modality, interpret critical imaging patterns, and integrate radiographic findings with clinical decision-making.

“Spine diagnostic imaging is governed by matching the specific clinical question to the complementary strengths of each modality. Radiographs assess weight-bearing alignment and dynamic instability; CT resolves complex osseous architecture, gas, and mineralization; MRI characterizes neural elements, bone marrow edema, and soft tissues; and nuclear imaging highlights active metabolic turnover. Radiographic findings must never be interpreted in isolation, as degenerative changes and incidental lesions are ubiquitous in asymptomatic individuals.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Core Concept
Complementary Roles of Imaging Modalities

Plain radiographs assess alignment and dynamic instability under load; CT provides sub-millimeter osseous detail and fracture morphology; MRI evaluates the spinal cord, nerve roots, marrow edema, and discs; and gadolinium-enhanced MRI separates recurrent disc from epidural scar.

🩺
Card 2 — Clinical Decision
Differentiate Pyogenic from Tuberculous Infection

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis destroys the intervertebral disc and adjacent endplates early with intense contrast enhancement. Tuberculous spondylodiscitis (Pott disease) spares the disc initially, features extensive subligamentous spread, large cold abscesses, and angular gibbus collapse.

📐
Card 3 — Key Pearl / Warning
CT is Mandatory for Rigid Spine Trauma

In patients with ankylosing spondylitis or DISH, minor trauma can produce highly unstable extension-distraction fractures ("chalk stick fractures") that are frequently missed on plain X-rays. Always perform thin-cut whole-spine CT in these patients.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 201-214Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Alves GNL

Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Alves GNL. Diagnóstico por imagem da coluna vertebral. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 201-214.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. As referências foram mantidas na ordem e com a numeração do capítulo. A pontuação e a apresentação foram uniformizadas segundo o estilo Vancouver, sem completar por suposição informações ausentes.
2. Hassankhani A, Freeman CW, Banks J, Parsons MS, Wessell DE, Hutchins TA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Spinal Trauma: 2024 Update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025;22(5S):S48-S66.
3. Loizides A, Obernauer J, Bale R, Plaikner M, Galiano K, Gruber H. Ultrasound-guided injections in the spine. Tech Orthop. 2013;28:6-11.
4. Wang YX, Wu A, Santiago FR, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Informed appropriate imaging for low back pain management: a narrative review. J Orthop Translat. 2018;15:21-34.
5. Dahmoush H, Gaddam DS, Ho M, Bauer DF, Bosemani T, Buchhalter J. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Back Pain-Child: 2024 Update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025;22(5S):S79-S107.
6. Fardon DF, Willians AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Rothman G, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0. The Spine Journal. 2014;14(11):2525-45.
7. Nascimento ED, Simão MN, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Fluid-sensitive sequences modify the Modic classification in MRI. Coluna/Columna. 2025;24(1):e292286.
8. Madsen R, Jensen TS, Pope M, Sorensen JS, Bendix T. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology, an MRI study of central spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(1):61-7.
9. Kanbara S, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F. Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(1):74-9.
10. Eshed I. Imaging characteristics of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: more than just spinal bony bridges. Diagnostics. 2023;13(3):563.
11. Resnick D, Niwayama G. Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Radiology. 1976;119(3):559-68.
12. Ortiz O, Levitt A, Shah L, Parsons, Argawal V, Baldwin K, et al. MS, ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Infection. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(11S):S488-S501.
13. Czuczman GJ, Mandell JC, Wessel DE, Lenchick L, Ahlawat S, Baker JC, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Inflammatory Back Pain: known or suspected axial spondyloarthritis 2021 update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(11S):S340-60.
14. Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG, Bariliakos X, Weber U, Machado PM, Pedersen SJ, et al. Data-driven definitions for active and structural MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint in spondyloarthritis and their predictive utility. Rheumatology. 2021;60(10):4778-89.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques