Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 40
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 4 • Spinal Deformities
Chapter40

Kyphosis

Vancouver: Defino HLA, Defino MP, Vieira RS📖 Pages: 531-550
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 4Spinal Deformities
Cap. 40Clinical Chapter
3authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Kyphosis is an integral component of the physiological sagittal curvature of the human spine, but becomes pathological when sagittal alignment alters in a manner incompatible with global balance, functional capacity, or neurological safety. Its clinical interpretation requires distinguishing normal physiological thoracic kyphosis from hyperkyphosis, and recognizing that curves with identical Cobb angles can exhibit vastly different morphometry, rigidity, segmental span, and biomechanical sequelae. Furthermore, compensatory adjustments in the cervical spine, lumbar lordosis, pelvis, and lower extremities can mask the true magnitude of underlying structural sagittal collapse. The chapter reviews a comprehensive etiological spectrum, including postural roundback, Scheuermann's disease, congenital vertebral malformations, iatrogenic post-laminectomy deformities, ankylosing spondylitis, metabolic disorders, neuromuscular diseases, and skeletal dysplasias. In every clinical scenario, diagnostic reasoning must synthesize the anterior column, posterior tension band, spinal canal patency, global sagittal balance, and disease natural history. Treatment selection depends not on an isolated angular threshold, but on the interplay among etiology, progression velocity, rigidity, symptoms, neural status, and spinopelvic harmony.
• Chapter Objective: To present the core concepts of sagittal alignment and elucidate the diverse etiologies producing pathological kyphotic deformities. The reader will master clinical and radiographic evaluation, recognize distinct pathognomonic features of major etiologies (postural, Scheuermann, congenital, iatrogenic, inflammatory), differentiate flexible from rigid structural curves, and understand the foundational principles governing observation, conservative orthoses, multi-level posterior column osteotomies (PCO/Ponte), three-column pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO), vertebral column resections (VCR), and targeted neural decompression.
• Kyphosis and global sagittal balanceThe normal human spine develops regional reciprocal curvatures postnatally that function in concert with the pelvis. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate this developmental biomechanics. The chapter emphasizes that sagittal evaluation cannot focus solely on the kyphotic apex: compensatory cervical hyperlordosis, lumbar hyperlordosis, and pelvic retroversion temporarily maintain global horizontal gaze and balance. Figure 3 differentiates anatomical from functional segmentation, while Figure 4 proves that two kyphotic curves with identical 70° Cobb angles can have completely different arc radii and clinical significance.
• Shared biomechanical failure mechanismsPathological kyphosis arises from structural failure of the anterior column under compression, insufficiency of the posterior tension band under tension, or a combined circumferential defect. As the gravity line shifts anteriorly, the flexor bending moment arm increases, mechanically accelerating deformity progression. The universal reconstructive principle is restoring anterior structural support and establishing posterior tension band stability while preserving spinal canal patency. Historically requiring combined anterior-posterior approaches, modern posterior-only osteotomies and resections allow single-stage posterior correction (Figures 6 to 8).
• Postural kyphosis and Scheuermann's diseasePostural kyphosis is fully flexible, lacks structural vertebral wedging, and responds reliably to physical therapy and posture re-education; surgery is never indicated. Scheuermann's disease is a structural deformity characterized by anterior vertebral body wedging (≥5° across ≥3 contiguous vertebrae), endplate irregularities, and Schmorl's nodes (Figures 10 to 13). Evaluation incorporates pain, skeletal maturity, curve rigidity, and progression. Most patients respond to conservative management (exercise, extension bracing). Progressive, rigid curves (>70-75°) with intractable pain may warrant posterior instrumented fusion with Ponte osteotomies (Figures 14 to 17).
• Congenital kyphosisCongenital kyphosis arises from embryonic vertebral formation failures, segmentation failures, or mixed defects (Figures 18 to 20). Natural history is aggressive, particularly in Type I formation failures, carrying high risks of progressive paraparesis. Early localized fusion in infants halts progression before extensive secondary structural curves develop. In delayed, rigid deformities, posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) or three-column osteotomies are required (Figures 21 to 23).
• Acquired kyphosis and systemic conditionsIatrogenic kyphosis typically results from multi-level laminectomies without fusion (Figures 24 to 27). The chapter also details fixed sagittal deformities in ankylosing spondylitis ('chin-on-chest' deformity), achondroplasia, neurofibromatosis type 1, and skeletal dysplasias (Figures 28 to 35). In each disease, systemic biology dictates unique mechanical vulnerabilities and neurological risks.
• Clinical Application: In clinical practice, the initial step is determining whether the kyphosis is postural, physiological, or structural. Physical examination evaluates spontaneous posture, prone hyperextension active self-correction, pelvic tilt, hamstring tightness, and upper motor neuron signs. Standing full-spine radiographs must capture the entire sagittal profile from occiput to femoral heads. Prone bolster hyperextension radiographs differentiate flexible from rigid curves. CT and MRI evaluate bony bridges, endplate wedging, canal stenosis, and spinal cord draping over the kyphotic apex. Postural curves require only exercise and reassurance. In Scheuermann's disease, bracing (e.g., Milwaukee or modern bivalve TLSO) is effective during growth spurts (Risser 0-2), whereas surgery is reserved for severe progressive painful curves (>70-75°) in mature patients, fusing from the proximal measured vertebra down to the stable sagittal vertebra to avoid distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). In congenital kyphosis, observation is hazardous; early short-segment posterior fusion in young children prevents devastating neurological deficits and avoids extensive late osteotomies. In ankylosing spondylitis or severe iatrogenic flatback, planned three-column osteotomies (PSO) at L2 or L3 restore lumbar lordosis and horizontal gaze while protecting major anterior vascular structures.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
KyphosisSpinal CurvaturesScheuermann DiseaseOsteotomySpinal FusionSpondylitis, AnkylosingAchondroplasiaOsteochondrodysplasias
⭐

Why this chapter matters

An identical 75° thoracic kyphosis angle can represent benign postural slouching in a teenager, structural Scheuermann's disease, progressive congenital hemivertebra with impending paraplegia, or iatrogenic post-laminectomy collapse. Managing all these conditions by a single Cobb number is a dangerous oversimplification. This chapter details how to identify the precise biomechanical mechanism, evaluate global compensations, and choose an intervention tailored to the patient's natural history and neurological risk.

“Pathological kyphosis is not a single disease, but the common phenotypic expression of diverse structural, developmental, and biomechanical failures. Comprehensive evaluation must integrate etiology, arc radius, flexibility, spinopelvic compensations, spinal canal patency, and global sagittal balance. Treatment spans posture re-education, brace therapy, multi-level posterior column osteotomies, and three-column resections designed to restore physiological sagittal balance and protect neurological integrity.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Core Concept
Cobb Angle Does Not Define the Disease

Two kyphotic deformities with identical angular measurements can differ radically in flexibility, span, and neurological danger. Accurate diagnosis requires identifying the underlying etiology and analyzing full-spine spinopelvic compensations.

🩺
Card 2 — Clinical Decision
Flexibility Dictates Surgical Strategy

Flexible curves respond to conservative care or standard posterior instrumentation. Rigid, structured kyphoses require multi-level facetectomies (Ponte osteotomies) or three-column resections (PSO/VCR) to restore physiological sagittal alignment.

📐
Card 3 — Pearl / Alert
Avoid Overcorrection and DJK

Chasing an unnaturally straight thoracic spine creates severe reciprocal stress. Overcorrection or stopping fusion short of the stable sagittal vertebra triggers proximal or distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK) and hardware pullout.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 531-550Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Defino HLA, Defino MP, Vieira RS

Defino HLA, Defino MP, Vieira RS. Cifose. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 531-550.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15:1142-7.
2. Adams MA, Dolan P. Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their clinical significance. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon). 1995;10:3-19.
3. Ahn H, Kreder H, Mahomed N, et al. Empirically derived maximal acceptable wait time for surgery to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. CMAJ. 2011;183:E565-E570.
4. Bamps S, Calenbergh FV, Loon JV, et al. Posterolateral approach in a neurofibromatosis type-I patient with severe dystrophic thoracic kyphoscoliosis: a case report, cadaver study, and literature review. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015;6:84-6.
5. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14:717-21.
6. Carr AJ, Jefferson RJ, Turner-Smith AR, et al. An analysis of normal back shape measured by ISIS scanning. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16:656-9.
7. Clark S. Waiting times for scoliosis surgery. Lancet. 2008;371:10-1.
8. Dabke H. Should patients wait for scoliosis surgery? Journal of Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88B:225.
9. Defino H, Fuentes A, Piola F. Tratamento cirúrgico da cifose patológica. Acta Ortop Bras. 2002;10(1):10-16.
10. Erickson MM, Currier BL. Surgical management of complex spinal deformity. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43:109-22, ix.
11. Fergunson S. Biomechanis of the spine. In: Boos N&AM, ed. Spinal disorders. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 41-63.
12. Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC Jr. Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134:979-83.
13. Haarmeyer A. Larsen syndrome--symptomatics and therapy. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1978;116:802-9.
14. Haher TR, O'Brien M, Dryer JW, et al. The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability. Identification of alternative paths of loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19:2667-70.
15. Han KS, Rohlmann A, Yang SJ, et al. Spinal muscles can create compressive follower loads in the lumbar spine in a neutral standing posture. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:472-8.
16. Hehne H, Zielke K. Die kyphotishe Deformität bei Spondylitis ankylosans. Sttutgart: Hippkcrates Verlag; 1990.
17. Herrero C, Porto M, Barbosa M, et al. Osteotomias segmentares múltiplas para a correção da cifose. Rev Bras Ortop. 2009;44(6):513-518.
18. Hollister DW, Byers PH, Holbrook KA. Genetic disorders of collagen metabolism. Adv Hum Genet. 1982;12:1-87.
19. Kapandji I. Fisiologia articular. São Paulo; 1987. p. 297.
20. Kopits S. Orthopaedic complication of dwarfism. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;114(153).
21. Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, et al. Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 5:564-71.
22. Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, et al. Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 5:699-703.
23. Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, et al. Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 5:558-63.
24. Lima Jr P. Escoliose idiopática do adolescente: perfil clínico e radiográfico da lista de espera para tratamento cirúrgico em hospital terciário de alta complexidade do Sistema Público de Saúde Brasileiro. Coluna/Columna. 2011;10(2):111.
25. Ma J, Jia LS, Shao J, et al. Surgical treatment strategies for severe cervicothoracic kyphosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011;91:2779-81.
26. Ma J, Wu Z, Yang X, et al. Surgical treatment of severe cervical dystrophic kyphosis due to neurofibromatosis Type 1: a review of 8 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:93-8.
27. Miladi L. Round and angular kyphosis in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:S140-S149.
28. Ocampo G, Ferreyra A, Contreras S, et al. Resección de hemivértebra con técnica de eggshell rn cifoescoliosis congénita: resultados en niños entre uno y siete años. Coluna/Columna. 2009;8(3):337-343.
29. Perez-Grueso FS, Cecchinato R, Berjano P. Ponte osteotomies in thoracic deformities. Eur Spine J. 2014.
30. Pudles E&DH. Coluna vertebral: conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre-RS: Artmed; 2013. p. 424.
31. Roussouly P, Nnadi C. Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1824-36.
32. Smith-Petersen M, Larson C, Aufranc O. Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthristis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945;27:1-11.
33. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7:335-42.
34. Tan R, Ma HS, Zou DW, et al. Surgical treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis by stages. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125:81-6.
35. Tolo VT. Surgical treatment of kyphosis in achondroplasia. Basic Life Sci. 1988;48:257-9.
36. Voutsinas SA, MacEwen GD. Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986:235-42.
37. White A&PM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. London: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1978. p. 534.
38. Winter RB. Severe neurofibromatosis kyphoscoliosis, posterior wedge osteotomy, halo-traction, and anterior autograft strut fusion, with 28-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1774-E1777.
39. Wu F, Zhang L, Liu Z, et al. Cervical neurofibromatosis with tetraplegia: management by cervical suspensory traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:E858-E862.
40. Wynne-Davis R. Genetics and congenital musculoskeletal disorders. Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1977;6:247-60.
41. Zileli M. Surgery for kyphosis. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2014;41:71-103.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques