Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 43
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 5 • Degenerative Diseases
Chapter43

Cervical Disc Herniation

Vancouver: Arantes Junior AA, Braga BD, Ribeiro DN, Lino Filho AM📖 Pages: 579-592
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 5Degenerative Diseases
Cap. 43Clinical Chapter
4authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Cervical disc herniation can manifest as axial neck pain, radiculopathy, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, or combined myeloradicular syndromes. Making a precise clinical distinction is decisive because isolated axial neck pain has a completely different prognosis and natural history than progressive nerve root or spinal cord compression. Disc degeneration, annular tears, repetitive biomechanical loads, and local inflammatory cascades interact in symptom genesis. Identifying the compressed nerve root requires careful correlation of dermatomal pain, sensory deficits, myotomal weakness, and deep tendon reflex changes, although anatomical variations can blur textbook boundaries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard diagnostic tool, but the high prevalence of asymptomatic disc bulges demands rigorous clinicoradiological concordance. Most radiculopathies resolve with structured conservative management. When surgery is indicated, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior foraminotomy, and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) represent validated options with distinct indications, while full-endoscopic approaches expand the minimally invasive armamentarium.
• Chapter Objective: To recognize diverse clinical presentations of cervical disc disease, correlate neurological deficits with specific anatomical levels, structure clinical and radiological workup, understand conservative management pathways, and define surgical indications for ACDF, posterior foraminotomy, cervical arthroplasty, and endoscopic decompression techniques.
• Radiculopathy and myelopathy are distinct clinical entitiesCervical disc herniation produces three distinct clinical syndromes: axial neck pain, radicular compression, or spinal cord compromise (myelopathy). Figures 43.2 to 43.5 illustrate sensory dermatomes, motor myotomes, and reflex changes for major cervical nerve roots (C5, C6, C7, C8). Dermatomal overlap implies that no single isolated finding should dictate diagnosis.
• History and physical examinationTargeted neurological examination includes segmental motor testing, sensory mapping, deep tendon reflexes, and provocative maneuvers. Spurling's test, the cervical distraction test, and Bakody's shoulder abduction sign (Figures 43.6 to 43.8) support radicular involvement. Loss of hand dexterity, clumsiness, hyperreflexia, clonus, Hoffmann's sign, and gait ataxia require immediate investigation for cervical myelopathy.
• Imaging and clinicoradiological correlationStanding plain radiographs assess sagittal cervical alignment and spondylosis. CT details osseous morphology and osteophytes. MRI (Figure 43.10) demonstrates soft disc herniations, cord compression, and intramedullary signal changes. When multiple degenerative levels exist or symptoms are ambiguous, electromyography or selective diagnostic nerve root blocks can isolate the culprit level.
• Management pathwaysIsolated radiculopathy is managed initially with non-operative care: physical therapy, analgesics, neuropathic agents, and selective epidural steroid injections. Surgery is indicated for intractable pain refractory to conservative therapy, progressive motor deficits, or myelopathy. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) remains the gold standard. Minimally invasive posterior foraminotomy preserves motion for posterolateral soft disc herniations, while cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) maintains segmental kinematics in selected non-spondylotic patients (Figures 43.13 to 43.21).
• Surgical safety and endoscopic evolutionDysphagia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, dural tears, infection, and adjacent segment disease must be anticipated and prevented. Full-endoscopic uniportal and biportal techniques offer targeted decompression with minimal tissue disruption in experienced hands.
• Clinical Application: In clinical practice, evaluation starts by identifying the clinical syndrome: axial pain, radiculopathy, or myelopathy. Irradiating arm pain must match a specific dermatome, myotome, and reflex deficit corresponding to the MRI lesion to prevent operating on incidental degenerative findings. Signs of myelopathy (clumsiness, gait ataxia) fundamentally change the timeline, necessitating timely surgical decompression. In uncomplicated radiculopathy, a 6-to-8-week trial of conservative care is standard. When surgery is required, decompression approach depends on compression location: midline anterior compressions are treated via ACDF or CDA, while pure lateral foraminal soft herniations in lordotic spines can be treated via posterior microforaminotomy or endoscopy, avoiding fusion. Anterior retraction must be gentle and intermittent to protect the esophagus and recurrent laryngeal nerve, and endplate preparation must preserve subchondral bone to prevent cage subsidence.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
Intervertebral Disc DisplacementCervical VertebraeRadiculopathyNeck PainSpinal Cord CompressionMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal FusionEndoscopy
⭐

Why this chapter matters

A cervical disc herniation can manifest as self-limiting neck stiffness or progress to irreversible quadriparesis from cervical myelopathy. Recognizing this distinction prevents both unnecessary surgeries for benign findings and dangerous delays in compressive myelopathy. This chapter provides a rigorous diagnostic and technical framework to select the right surgical corridor for each patient.

“In cervical disc herniation, imaging must confirm a clinical syndrome, not invent one. Radiculopathy, myelopathy, and axial pain have distinct natural histories and therapeutic priorities. Most radiculopathies resolve conservatively, while myelopathy or progressive motor loss warrants surgery. When operative treatment is indicated, the approach (ACDF, posterior foraminotomy, arthroplasty, or endoscopy) must be tailored to compression geometry, cervical alignment, and the clinical goal.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Core Concept
Correlate Anatomy Before Operating

Dermatomes, myotomes, and reflexes identify the culprit nerve root. Surgical indication requires strict concordance between clinical neurological findings and MRI pathology to avoid operating on incidental degenerative findings.

🩺
Card 2 — Clinical Decision
Myelopathy Shifts Urgency

Gait ataxia, loss of hand dexterity, and hyperreflexia indicate spinal cord compression and must not be treated as simple radiculopathy. Cervical myelopathy demands prompt neurosurgical decompression to prevent irreversible neurological loss.

📐
Card 3 — Pearl / Alert
Match the Approach to Compression Location

ACDF, posterior foraminotomy, arthroplasty, and endoscopy have specific indications. Central disc herniations require anterior decompression; lateral foraminal soft discs can be managed with motion-preserving posterior foraminotomy.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 579-592Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Arantes Junior AA, Braga BD, Ribeiro DN, Lino Filho AM

Arantes Junior AA, Braga BD, Ribeiro DN, Lino Filho AM. Hérnia de disco cervical. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 579-592.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(6):834-48.
2. Hoy DG, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):783-92.
3. Clark CR, Benzel EC, Cervical Spine Research Society, Editorial Committee. The Cervical Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
4. Roughley PJ. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(23):2691-9.
5. Abbed KM, Coumans JV. Cervical radiculopathy: pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(1 Suppl 1):S28-34.
6. Hunt WE, Miller CA. Management of cervical radiculopathy. Clin Neurosurg. 1986;33:485-502.
7. Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):392-9.
8. Viikari-Juntura E, Porras M, Laasonen EM. Validity of clinical tests in the diagnosis of root compression in cervical disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14(3):253-7.
9. Davidson RI, Dunn EJ, Metzmaker JN. The shoulder abduction test in the diagnosis of radicular pain in cervical extradural compressive monoradiculopathies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981;6(5):441-6.
10. Clemente CD, editor. The peripheral nervous system. In: Clemente CD, Gray H. Gray’s Anatomy. 30th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1985. p. 1205-21.
11. Ross DA, Ross MN. Diagnosis and treatment of C4 radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(23):1790-4.
12. Bogduk N, Windsor M, Inglis A. The innervation of the cervical intervertebral discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(1):2-8.
13. Freemont AJ, Watkins A, Le Maitre C, Baird P, Jeziorska M, Knight MT, et al. Nerve growth factor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc. J Pathol. 2002;197(3):286-92.
14. Cooper G, Bailey B, Bogduk N. Cervical zygapophysial joint pain maps. Pain Med. 2007;8(4):344-53.
15. Rao R. Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(10):1872-81.
16. Payne EE, Spillane JD. The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens with particular reference to cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1957;80(4):571-96.
17. Cloward RB. Diaphragm paralysis from cervical disc lesions. Br J Neurosurg. 1988;2(3):395-9.
18. Paterno JM, Silverberg CM, Khanna AJ, Singla AK. Common clinical and correlative pain generators of the cervical and lumbosacral spine. In: Khanna AJ, editor. MRI Essentials for the Spine Specialist. New York: Thieme; 2014. p. 45-67.
19. Penning L. Normal movements of the cervical spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130(2):317-26.
20. Murphey F, Simmons JC, Brunson B. Surgical treatment of laterally ruptured cervical disc. Review of 648 cases, 1939 to 1972. J Neurosurg. 1973;38(6):679-83.
21. Harrop JS, Hanna A, Silva MT, Sharan A. Neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis: an overview of signs, symptoms, and pathophysiology. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(1 Suppl 1):S14-20.
22. Kim YJ, Oh SH, Yi HJ, Kim YS, Ko Y, Oh SJ. Myelopathy caused by soft cervical disc herniation: surgical results and prognostic factors. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2007;42(6):441-5.
23. The peripheral nervous system. In: Clemente CD, Gray H, editors. Gray’s Anatomy. 30th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1985. p. 1205-21.
24. Bates B. A Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 5th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991.
25. Bland JH. Disorders of the Cervical Spine: Diagnosis and Medical Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994.
26. McRae R. Clinical orthopaedic examination. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
27. Pyhtinen J, Laitinen J. Cervical intervertebral foramen narrowing and myelographic nerve root sleeve deformities. Neuroradiology. 1993;35(8):596-7.
28. Scotti G, Scialfa G, Pieralli S, Boccardi E, Valsecchi F, Tonon C. Myelopathy and radiculopathy due to cervical spondylosis: myelographic-CT correlations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1983;4(3):601-3.
29. Brown BM, Schwartz RH, Frank E, Blank NK. Preoperative evaluation of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy by surface-coil MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(6):1205-12.
30. Ghadimi M, Thomas A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contraindications. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
31. Dillin W, Uppal GS. Analysis of medications used in the treatment of cervical disk degeneration. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23(3):421-33.
32. Robertson K, Marshman LA, Plummer D. Pregabalin and gabapentin for the treatment of sciatica. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;26:1-7.
33. Naylor JR, Mulley GP. Surgical collars: a survey of their prescription and use. Br J Rheumatol. 1991;30(4):282-4.
34. Tan JC, Nordin M. Role of physical therapy in the treatment of cervical disk disease. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23(3):435-49.
35. Sasso RC, Macadaeg K, Nordmann D, Smith M. Selective nerve root injections can predict surgical outcome for lumbar and cervical radiculopathy: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(6):471-8.
36. Klein GR, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Health outcome assessment before and after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for radiculopathy: a prospective analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(7):801-3.
37. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A(3):607-24.
38. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Skie M, Heck BE, Yeasting RA. Vulnerability of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the anterior approach to the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(22):2664-7.
39. Kilburg C, Sullivan HG, Mathiason MA. Effect of approach side during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(4):273-7.
40. Epstein NE. A review of complication rates for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:100.
41. Zhou J, Li J, Lin H, Li X, Zhou X, Dong J. A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;170:73-8.
42. Kang MS, Choi KC, Lee CD, Shin YH, Hur SM, Lee SH. Effective cervical decompression by the posterior cervical foraminotomy without discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(5):271-6.
43. Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(18):1684-92.
44. Scoville WB, Whitcomb BB. Lateral rupture of cervical intervertebral disks. Postgrad Med. 1966;39(2):174-80.
45. Yao N, Wang C, Wang W, Wang L. Full-endoscopic technique for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: 5-year follow-up results of 67 cases. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):899-904.
46. A narrative review of biportal endoscopic spine surgery in the cervical and thoracic spine: insights into its capabilities, limitations, and possibilities. J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2023;8(1):36-43.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques