Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 77
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 8 • 8
Chapter77

CERVICAL LAMINOPLASTY: PRINCIPLES, TECHNIQUES, AND CURRENT EVIDENCE

Vancouver: Brock RS, Soares AM📖 Pages: 955-966
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 88
Cap. 77Clinical Chapter
2authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and multi-level ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) represent major causes of progressive spinal cord dysfunction in adults. While anterior multi-level decompression and fusion (ACDF/ACCF) or posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion are effective, they permanently eliminate cervical mobility and carry risks of pseudarthrosis, dysphagia, and adjacent segment degeneration. Cervical laminoplasty was developed as a non-fusion, motion-preserving posterior decompressive technique that expands the dimensions of the spinal canal while maintaining the protective posterior arch and preserving baseline cervical alignment. By hinging the lamina open on one side (open-door / Hirabayashi) or splitting the spinous processes down the midline (double-door / French-door / Kurokawa) and securing the lamina with miniplates or spacers, laminoplasty achieves direct canal expansion and allows the spinal cord to drift posteriorly away from ventral compressive ridges. Successful outcomes depend on strict patient selection, preserved baseline cervical lordosis, and precise surgical technique.
• Chapter Objective: Detail the biomechanical principles, clinical indications, surgical techniques (open-door and double-door), fixation methods (miniplates, spacers), and clinical evidence for cervical laminoplasty. The reader will learn to calculate canal expansion, select ideal candidates based on sagittal alignment, perform unhinged opening, and prevent complications such as C5 nerve root palsy, hinge closure, axial neck pain, and post-laminoplasty kyphosis.
• Biomechanical rationale and the posterior cord drift conceptLaminoplasty widens the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal, relieving direct dorsal compression and enabling the spinal cord to migrate posteriorly ('drift back') away from ventral osteophytes and OPLL bars. This posterior drift relies entirely on preserved cervical lordosis; in a kyphotic spine, the spinal cord remains draped over anterior compressive ridges despite posterior canal expansion.
• Indications and patient selection criteriaIdeal indications include multi-level (≥3 levels) cervical spondylotic myelopathy, continuous or mixed-type OPLL, posterior canal stenosis, and congenital narrow canal with preserved cervical lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb angle >10°). Absolute contraindications include fixed cervical kyphosis (>5°–10°), severe anterior single-level focal compression, gross translational instability, and severe axial neck pain (which may worsen after laminoplasty).
• Open-Door Laminoplasty (Hirabayashi technique)A unilateral open trough (complete bicortical osteotomy) is created at the laminofacet junction on the more symptomatic side, while a contralateral greenstick hinge trough (outer cortical thinning, inner cortex preserved) is drilled. The lamina is gently elevated 4–5 mm and secured open with titanium miniplates or bone struts (Figure 77.1).
• Double-Door / French-Door Laminoplasty (Kurokawa technique)The spinous processes are split down the exact midline, and bilateral partial-thickness greenstick troughs are drilled at the bilateral laminofacet junctions. Both hemi-laminae are opened outward like a French door and secured with ceramic/allograft spacers or titanium miniplates.
• Evidence and complicationsRandomized trials and meta-analyses show neurological recovery (JOA score gains) comparable to laminectomy with fusion and ACDF, with lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay, preserved cervical range of motion (50–70% maintained), and lower adjacent segment disease rates. Recognized complications include postoperative C5 nerve root palsy (3–10%), hinge spring-back closure, axial neck pain, and progressive loss of lordosis.
• Clinical Application: In clinical practice, laminoplasty is the procedure of choice for multi-level (C3-C7) cervical myelopathy in patients with preserved cervical lordosis (>10° C2-C7 Cobb angle) and minimal neck pain. Preoperative sagittal radiographs in standing position must be measured for cervical lordosis and modified K-line (especially in OPLL). If the spine is kyphotic, laminoplasty is contraindicated and anterior reconstruction or posterior instrumented fusion is required. Intraoperatively, hinge troughs must be created with high-speed diamond burrs with cold irrigation, thinning the dorsal cortex while keeping the ventral cortex pliable without complete fracture. Opening the lamina must be gradual and smooth to avoid sudden cord traction or hinge fracture. Postoperatively, C5 nerve root palsy (deltoid/biceps weakness) must be recognized as a traction phenomenon resulting from rapid posterior cord drift, typically managed conservatively with high-dose steroids and physical therapy.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
LaminoplastyCervical VertebraeSpinal Cord CompressionOssification of Posterior Longitudinal LigamentRange of Motion, ArticularPostoperative ComplicationsBone Plates
⭐

Why this chapter matters

Multi-level anterior fusion carries high rates of pseudarthrosis and dysphagia, while posterior laminectomy without fusion causes post-laminectomy kyphosis ('swan-neck deformity'). Laminoplasty resolves this dilemma by expanding the canal while maintaining the structural arch and preserving mobility. This chapter teaches surgeons the biomechanical rules of posterior cord drift, the technical execution of open-door and double-door techniques, and the management of C5 palsy and hinge complications.

“Cervical laminoplasty is an established, motion-preserving posterior decompressive technique for multi-level cervical myelopathy and OPLL in lordotic spines. It achieves dependable neurological recovery while avoiding fusion-related complications, provided surgeons enforce strict sagittal alignment criteria, create stable hinges, and secure the expanded laminae with rigid miniplates.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Posterior Drift Requires Baseline Lordosis
Lordosis prerequisite

Laminoplasty relies on the spinal cord drifting posteriorly away from anterior osteophytes. This phenomenon occurs only in lordotic spines (>10°); in kyphotic alignment, the cord remains compressed against anterior structures.

🩺
Card 2 — Secure the Hinge with Titanium Miniplates
Miniplate fixation stability

Fixing the open lamina with rigid titanium miniplates prevents spring-back hinge closure and eliminates the need for prolonged postoperative collar immobilization.

📐
Card 3 — C5 Palsy as a Traction Phenomenon
C5 root traction palsy

Postoperative deltoid weakness (C5 palsy) results from rapid posterior cord drift tethering the short C5 nerve root. Limiting excessive canal opening and gentle decompression reduce its occurrence.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 955-966Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Brock RS, Soares AM

Brock RS, Soares AM. Laminoplastia cervical: princípios, técnicas e evidências atuais. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 955-966.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. Oyama M, Hattori S, Moriwaki N. A new method of cervical laminectomy. Chubu Nihon Seikei Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1973;16:792-4.
2. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1983;8(7):693-9.
3. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H, et al. Enlargement of spinal canal by sagittal splitting of the spinous process. Bessatsu Seikeigeka. 1982;2:234-40.
4. Fehlings MG, Barry S, Kopjar B, et al. Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 435 patients. Spine. 2013;38(26):2247-52.
5. Radcliff KE, Limthongkul W, Kepler CK, et al. Cervical laminoplasty: review of techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(3):145-52.
6. Gu Y, Cao P, Gao R, et al. Incidence and risk factors of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115048.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques