Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 21
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 3 • Section 3 — Spinal Trauma
Chapter21

Traumatic Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine

Vancouver: Pudles E, Rocha LGD📖 Pages: 299-318
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 3Section 3 — Spinal Trauma
Cap. 21Clinical Chapter
2authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Traumatic injuries of the subaxial cervical spine (C3–C7) represent the majority of all cervical fractures and dislocations, accounting for substantial morbidity and traumatic quadriplegia in young active individuals (high-energy motor vehicle crashes, diving accidents) and elderly patients (low-energy ground-level falls on degenerative, stenotic spines). The subaxial spine combines wide range of motion with mechanical load bearing; acute traumatic failure involves complex combinations of axial compression, flexion, extension, rotation, and distraction. Injuries range from stable compression fractures to catastrophic distractive flexion injuries, unilateral or bilateral facet subluxation/dislocation ("locked facets"), and burst fractures with traumatic cord compression. Systematically evaluating mechanical stability relies on assessing the three columns and the integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex (PLC: supraspinous and interspinous ligaments, ligamentum flavum, and facet capsules) and the anterior/posterior longitudinal ligaments. Modern classification systems—predominantly the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and the Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) score—integrate fracture morphology (Type A compression, Type B tension band/distraction, Type C translation/displacement, and Type F facet injuries), PLC status, neurological examination (N0–N4, Nx), and clinical modifiers (M1–M4). Multi-detector CT defines bony fracture morphology and facet apposition, while urgent MRI evaluates traumatic disc herniations, spinal cord edema/hemorrhage, and ligamentous disruption. Treatment strategy—closed traction reduction, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior instrumented reduction and lateral mass/pedicle screw fusion, or combined circumferential stabilization—depends on cord compression, facet reduction, traumatic disc status, and construct biomechanics.
• Chapter Objective: To present the clinical evaluation, classification, biomechanical stability assessment, and surgical/non-operative management of subaxial cervical spine trauma (C3–C7). The reader should be able to apply the AO Spine and SLIC classification systems; recognize stable versus unstable injury patterns; assess facet joint subluxation and locked facet morphology; evaluate the role of urgent closed reduction vs. operative reduction in facet dislocations; recognize the danger of extruded traumatic disc herniations during reduction; and select anterior, posterior, or circumferential surgical approaches.
• Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Injury MechanismsThe subaxial cervical spine (C3–C7) features lordotic alignment, oblique facet joints (angled ~45° in the sagittal plane), uncovertebral joints of Luschka, and transverse foramina transmitting the vertebral arteries. The three-column concept and tension band integrity govern stability. Primary injury mechanisms include: 1) Compression/Axial loading (AO Type A): minor compression (A1/A2), burst fractures (A3 incomplete, A4 complete burst with retropulsion); 2) Distraction/Tension band failure (AO Type B): anterior tension band failure in hyperextension (B1/B3) or posterior tension band disruption in hyperflexion (B2); 3) Translation/Displacement (AO Type C): mechanical dislocation or subluxation in any plane; 4) Facet Injuries (AO Type F): F1 nondisplaced facet fracture, F2 displaced facet fracture, F3 floating lateral mass, F4 facet subluxation/dislocation (unilateral or bilateral locked facets).
• Classification Systems: AO Spine Subaxial and SLIC ScoreThe AO Spine Subaxial classification organizes injuries hierarchically by morphology (Types A, B, C, F), neurology (N0 intact, N1 transient, N2 radiculopathy, N3 incomplete cord, N4 complete cord, Nx unexaminable), and modifiers (M1 PLC indeterminate, M2 disc herniation, M3 metabolic/ankylosing disease, M4 vertebral artery injury). The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) score grades three independent categories: 1) Fracture morphology (0–4 points: no abnormality = 0, compression = 1, burst = 2, distraction = 3, translation/rotation = 4); 2) Neurological status (0–4 points: intact = 0, root = 1, complete cord = 2, incomplete cord = 3, continuous cord compression +1); 3) PLC integrity (0–2 points: intact = 0, indeterminate = 1, disrupted = 2). A total SLIC score <=3 indicates non-operative management (rigid cervical collar); SLIC = 4 is equivocal; SLIC >=5 mandates surgical stabilization.
• Facet Dislocations and the Traumatic Disc DilemmaFacet subluxation and bilateral/unilateral locked facets (AO F4 / Type C) represent severe translation injuries with complete disruption of the posterior tension band and intervertebral disc. In awake, cooperative patients with bilateral locked facets and incomplete neurological deficits, immediate closed skeletal reduction with Gardner-Wells tongs (starting with 5 kg and adding 2–3 kg per level under continuous fluoroscopic and neurological monitoring) can rapidly decompress the spinal canal. However, pre-reduction MRI (or emergent intraoperative exploration) is vital because an extruded traumatic disc herniation retropulsed behind the displaced vertebral body can cause catastrophic spinal cord transection during closed or open posterior reduction maneuvers. If a massive extruded disc herniation is present on MRI, anterior cervical discectomy and decompression must precede facet reduction.
• Surgical Decision-Making and Operative ApproachesSurgical approach is tailored to pathology: 1) Anterior approach (ACDF or corpectomy with anterior plating): ideal for teardrop fractures, burst fractures (A3/A4) with anterior cord compression, and facet dislocations with herniated traumatic discs; 2) Posterior approach (lateral mass screw fixation C3–C6, pedicle screw fixation C7): preferred for highly unstable posterior tension band disruptions (B2), irreducible locked facets, floating lateral masses (F3), or ankylosing spondylitis fractures; 3) Combined 360° circumferential stabilization: required for severe multi-column comminution, severe osteopenia, or severe three-column dissociation.
• Clinical Application: In the emergency trauma center, managing subaxial cervical trauma requires immediate assessment of neurological status and facet alignment on CT. In an alert patient presenting with bilateral locked facets and acute quadriparesis, emergent closed reduction under conscious sedation or emergent operative reduction within 4 hours restores canal diameter and provides the highest chance of neurological recovery. If the patient is obtunded or if MRI shows an extruded herniated disc fragment lodged behind the dislocated vertebral body, perform an emergent anterior cervical discectomy first to remove the disc fragment, followed by anterior reduction and plating (or posterior instrumentation if anterior reduction fails). In geriatric patients presenting with central cord syndrome following minor hyperextension trauma without fracture (AO B3/M3), urgent MRI demonstrates cord edema and preexisting canal stenosis, guiding early decompressive surgery (<24 hours). In patients with facet fractures involving the transverse foramen (AO M4), obtain CT Angiography of the neck to evaluate vertebral artery occlusion or dissection.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
Cervical VertebraeSpinal FracturesJoint DislocationsSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal FusionMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedJoint Instability
⭐

Why this chapter matters

Subaxial cervical spine trauma combines high risk of permanent quadriplegia with severe mechanical instability. Failing to recognize facet subluxation or attempting posterior locked facet reduction in the presence of an unrecognized retrovertebral extruded disc can produce irreversible iatrogenic cord transection. This chapter provides a clear diagnostic and operative roadmap, integrating classification scores (AO Spine and SLIC), closed reduction guidelines, and approach selection (anterior vs. posterior vs. 360°) to restore alignment and protect neural function.

“Management of subaxial cervical spine trauma (C3–C7) requires precise integration of fracture morphology, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity, neurological status, and traumatic disc herniation risk. Applying the AO Spine Subaxial classification and SLIC score guides the threshold between rigid collar immobilization and surgical stabilization. Rapid closed or open facet reduction within hours—preceded by anterior discectomy when extruded disc fragments threaten the cord—maximizes neurological recovery.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Core Concept
SLIC Score Guides Surgical Threshold

The SLIC score quantifies morphology (0–4), PLC integrity (0–2), and neurology (0–4). Scores <=3 indicate non-operative management (rigid collar); SLIC = 4 is equivocal; scores >=5 mandate surgical decompression and stabilization.

🩺
Card 2 — Clinical Decision
Rule Out Extruded Disc Before Posterior Reduction

In locked facet dislocations, an extruded traumatic disc herniation can retropulse during reduction maneuvers, causing acute cord transection. When a large disc extrusion is identified on MRI, perform anterior discectomy (ACDF) prior to reducing the facet joints.

📐
Card 3 — Key Pearl / Warning
Urgent Reduction of Locked Facets

In alert patients with locked facets and incomplete quadriparesis, rapid closed skeletal traction reduction or emergent operative reduction within hours restores spinal canal dimensions and maximizes the potential for meaningful neurological recovery.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 299-318Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Pudles E, Rocha LGD

Pudles E, Rocha LGD. Lesões traumáticas da coluna cervical subaxial. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 299-318.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. Montesano PX, Jauch E, Jonsson H Jr. Anatomic and biomechanical study of posterior cervical spine plate arthrodesis: an evaluation of two different techniques of screw placement. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5:301-5.
2. Vaccaro AR, Betz RR, Zeidhman SH. Principles and practice of spinal surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003.
3. Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine. 1997;22:977-82.
4. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K. Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine.
5. Ulrich C, Arand M, Nothwang J. Internal fixation on the lower cervical spine—biomechanics and clinical practice of procedures and implants. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:88-100.
6. Jeanneret B, Gebhard JS, Magerl F. Transpedicular screw fixation of articular mass fracture-separation: results of an anatomical study and operative technique. J Spinal Disord. 1994;7:222-9.
7. Mainan DJ, Sances A Jr, Mykleburst JB, Larson SJ, Houterman C, Chilbert M, et al. Compression injuries of the cervical spine: a biomechanical analysis. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:254-60.
8. Seves PE. Biomechanics of the injured cervical spine. In: Vaccaro AR, editor. Fractures of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. New York: Marcel Denker; 2003. p. 23-44.
9. Louis R. Les theories de l'instabilité. Rev Chir Orthop Reparative Appar Mot. 1977;63:423-5.
10. Raynor RB, Kingman AF. Cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 1968;8:597-604.
11. Louis R. Surgery of the spine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983.
12. White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;(109):85-96.
13. Hartman J. Anatomy and clinical significance of the uncinate process and uncovertebral joint: a comprehensive review. Clin Anat. 2014;27(3):431-40. doi:10.1002/ca.22317.
14. Núñez-Pereira S, Hitzl W, Bullmann V, Meier O, Koller H. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocervical and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(1):16-23. doi:10.3171/2014.11.SPINE14368.
15. Patwardhan AG, Khayatzadeh S, Nguyen NL, Havey RM, Voronov LI, Muriuki MG, et al. Is cervical sagittal imbalance a risk factor for adjacent segment pathomechanics after multilevel fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov 30. [Epub ahead of print].
16. Caracterização clínica e das situações de fratura da coluna vertebral no município de Ribeirão Preto, propostas para um programa de prevenção do trauma raquimedular. Coluna/Columna. 2011;10(1):40-3.
17. Pudles E, Defino HLA, organizadores. A coluna vertebral: conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2014. p. 115-116.
18. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O'Brien RP. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7(1):1-27.
19. Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine. 2007;32:2365-74.
20. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201.
21. van Middendorp JJ, Audige L, Hanson B, Chapman JR, Hosman AJ. What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1238-49.
22. Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Radcliff KE, Oner C, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, et al. AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J. 2015;(2).
23. Savas PE. Biomechanics of the injured cervical spine. In: Vaccaro AR, editor. Fractures of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 23-44.
24. White AA, Panjabi MM. Update on the evaluation of instability of the lower cervical spine. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4:277-285.
25. Lee JY, Nassr A, Eck JC, Vaccaro AR. Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. Spine J. 9(5):418-423.
26. Grauer JN, Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Nassr A, Dvorak MF, Harrop JS, et al. The timing and influence of MRI on the management of patients with cervical facet dislocations remains highly variable: a survey of members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(2):96-9. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816a9ebd.
27. Dunham CM, Brocker BP, Collier D, Gemmel D. Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit. Clincal Care. 2008;12:R89.
28. Gelb DE, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Hurlbert RJ, Rozzelle CJ, Ryken TC, et al. Treatment of subaxial cervical spinal injuries. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:187-194.
29. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037.
30. Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Hoekema J, et al. Factors predicting motor recovery and functional outcome after traumatic central cord syndrome: a long-term follow-up. Spine. 2005;30:2303-11.
31. Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Fujita K, et al. Traumatic central cord syndrome: analysis of factors affecting the outcome. Surg Neurol. 2005;63:95-9.
32. Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, Rampersaud YR, Oner FC, Aarabi B, Vaccaro AR. The surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries. An evidence-based algorithm based on the SLIC classification system. Spine. 2007;32(23):2620-2629.
33. An HS. Cervical spine trauma. Spine. 1998;23:2713-29.
34. Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine: an analysis of 300 hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:1119-42.
35. Mirza SK, Anderson PA. Injuries of lower cervical spine. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Traffon PG, editors. Skeletal trauma. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. p. 814-74.
36. Middendoro JJ, Slooff WBM, Nellestein WR, Oner C. Incidence of and risk factors for complications associated with halo-vest immobilizatios: a prospective, descriptive cohort study of 239 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):71-9.
37. Caron T, Bransford R, Nguyen Q, Agel J, Chapman J, Bellabarba C. Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(11):E458-64. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc764f.
38. Lifeso RM, Colucci MA. Anterior fusion for rotationally unstable cervical spine fractures. Spine. 25(16):2028-2034.
39. Brodke DS, Anderson PA, Newell DW, Grady MS, Chapman JR. Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches in cervical spinal cord injuries. Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(3):229-35.
40. Hast RA, Vaccaro AR, Nachwalter RS. Cervical facet dislocation: when is magnetic resonance imaging indicated? Spine. 2002;27:116-8.
41. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Flanders AE, Balderston RA, Northrup BE, Cotler JM. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments, and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(12):1210-7.
42. Gelb DE, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Hurlbert RJ, Rozzelle CJ, et al. Initial closed reduction of cervical spinal fracture-dislocation injuries. Neurosurgery. 2013;72 Suppl 2:73-83.
43. Miller CP, Brubacher JW, Biswas D, Lawrence BD, Whang PG, Grauer JN. The indidence of noncontiguous spinal fractures and other traumatic injuries associated with cervical spine fractures. Spine. 36(19):1532-1540.
44. Fehlings MG, Sekhon LHS, Tator C. The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury: what do we know? What should we do? Spine. 2001;26(24 Suppl):S101-10.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques