Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 27
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 4 • Spinal Deformities
Chapter27

Introduction to Spinal Deformities

Vancouver: Pudles E, Defino HLA📖 Pages: 375-398
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 4Spinal Deformities
Cap. 27Clinical Chapter
2authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Spinal deformities correspond to alterations in physiological spinal curvatures or the appearance of abnormal deviations in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. Although scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis are traditionally described as separate entities, modern spine surgery conceptualizes all clinically relevant spinal deformities as complex, three-dimensional (3D) spatial phenomena governed by vertebral morphology, axial rotation, skeletal growth, global spinopelvic alignment, and neuromuscular compensatory mechanisms. Deformities encompass a diverse spectrum of underlying etiologies: idiopathic (infantile, juvenile, adolescent [AIS], adult degenerative), congenital (segmentation failures, formation failures), neuromuscular (cerebral palsy, spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy), syndromic/mesenchymal (Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta), neurofibromatosis (NF-1 dystrophic and non-dystrophic), post-traumatic, post-laminectomy, infectious, and neoplastic deformities. Identifying a spinal curve is merely the starting point of diagnostic synthesis: clinical history, physical inspection (Adam's forward bend test, trunk balance, skin stigmata), pain characterization, neurological examination, skeletal maturity assessment (Risser sign, Sanders bone age, open triradiate cartilage), and standardized standing 36-inch radiographs must be integrated to determine curve structurality, predict future progression risk, and guide individualized conservative versus surgical management.
• Chapter Objective: To present the fundamental concepts, standardized terminology, classification principles, and diagnostic clinical/radiographic evaluation of spinal deformities. The reader should be able to understand the three-dimensional nature of scoliosis and kyphosis; identify structural versus non-structural curves; recognize red-flag atypical curve patterns requiring advanced neuroimaging (MRI); assess skeletal maturity and progression risk; and utilize standardized radiographic parameters (Cobb angle, apical vertebra, neutral/stable vertebrae, pelvic parameters) to characterize spinal alignment.
• Spinal Deformity as a Three-Dimensional PhenomenonSpinal deformities alter normal regional alignment across all three dimensions simultaneously: 1) Coronal plane (lateral curvature measured by the Cobb angle; scoliosis is defined as a coronal Cobb angle >=10° with vertebral rotation); 2) Axial plane (vertebral axial rotation, causing the posterior spinous processes to rotate into the concavity while the vertebral body and attached ribs rotate toward the convexity, forming the diagnostic rib hump or lumbar prominence); 3) Sagittal plane (hypokyphosis/lordoscoliosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, hyperkyphosis in Scheuermann disease, loss of lumbar lordosis in degenerative flatback deformity).
• Etiological Spectrum and PathogenesisDeformities are categorized etiologically: 1) Idiopathic: most common (80% of all scoliosis), divided by age of onset into Infantile (<3 years), Juvenile (3–9 years), Adolescent (AIS, 10–18 years), and Adult De Novo (>18 years); 2) Congenital: embryological malformations during weeks 4–8 (hemivertebrae, wedge vertebrae, unsegmented unilateral bars, block vertebrae); 3) Neuromuscular: long C-shaped collapsing curves with pelvic obliquity due to upper or lower motor neuron disease; 4) Syndromic and Connective Tissue: Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos, Down syndrome; 5) Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF-1): characterized by sharp, short-segment angular dystrophic curves with rib penciling and scalloping; 6) Secondary/Degenerative: asymmetric disc/facet collapse in adults.
• Structural vs. Non-Structural CurvesA fundamental diagnostic step is distinguishing structural from non-structural (compensatory) curves using supine maximum lateral bending radiographs: 1) Structural curves possess intrinsic rigidity, fail to correct below 20°–25° on dynamic bending films, and exhibit fixed axial vertebral rotation toward the convexity (Nash-Moe or Perdriolle grading); 2) Non-structural (compensatory) curves develop above or below a primary structural curve to maintain coronal head balance, lack fixed rotation, and demonstrate complete or near-complete flexibility (<20°–25°) on bending radiographs.
• Curve Characterization: Apex, Cobb Angle, and Key VertebraeStandardized terminology defines curve anatomy: 1) Apical Vertebra: the vertebra most deviated from the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) and exhibiting maximal axial rotation and horizontal tilt; 2) End Vertebrae (Superior and Inferior): the vertebrae at the cranial and caudal limits of the curve that are most tilted toward the concavity; 3) Cobb Angle: the angle formed between lines drawn along the superior endplate of the upper end vertebra and the inferior endplate of the lower end vertebra; 4) Neutral Vertebra: the most cranial/caudal vertebra with symmetric, non-rotated pedicles; 5) Stable Vertebra: the most proximal lumbar vertebra bisected by the CSVL.
• Skeletal Maturity and Progression RiskCurve progression risk depends directly on remaining skeletal growth and initial curve magnitude. Skeletal maturity is assessed via: 1) Tanner stage (secondary sexual characteristics, peak height velocity at Tanner 2–3 in girls); 2) Risser sign (iliac apophysis ossification from anterolateral [Risser 1] to posteromedial [Risser 4] and complete fusion [Risser 5]; Risser 0–2 represents high progression risk); 3) Triradiate Cartilage status (open acetabular triradiate cartilage indicates the peak adolescent growth spurt is yet to occur, carrying the highest progression risk); 4) Sanders Bone Age (hand/wrist radiograph grading 1–8, providing superior precision over Risser sign during peak growth).
• Comprehensive Spinopelvic and Coronal AssessmentFull-length 36-inch standing radiographs evaluate global balance: Coronal balance is assessed via the C7 plumb line (measured relative to the CSVL, normal <1.5–2.0 cm offset). Sagittal balance evaluates the Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (T5–T12 Cobb angle), lumbar lordosis (T12–S1), and pelvic parameters (Pelvic Incidence [PI], Pelvic Tilt [PT], Sacral Slope [SS]). Identifying atypical curves—such as left-sided thoracic curves, rapid progression, severe pain, or focal neurological deficits—mandates emergent whole-spine MRI to rule out syringomyelia, Chiari I malformation, tethered cord, or spinal tumors.
• Clinical Application: In outpatient spine practice, evaluate every patient presenting with spinal asymmetry through a structured step-by-step approach. Perform Adam's forward bend test with a Scoliometer: an Angle of Trunk Rotation (ATR) >=5°–7° warrants standing 36-inch spinal radiographs. Calculate the Cobb angle and determine skeletal maturity (Risser score and triradiate cartilage status). In a 12-year-old pre-menarchal girl with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), Risser 0, open triradiate cartilage, and a 25° right thoracic curve, recognize the high risk of rapid progression (>70% risk), mandating immediate rigid full-time bracing (TLSO / Boston brace worn 18–23 hours/day) and serial radiographs every 4–6 months. In any patient presenting with an atypical left-sided thoracic curve, unexplained nocturnal back pain, abnormal abdominal cutaneous reflexes, or foot asymmetry (cavus foot), obtain an urgent whole-spine MRI: up to 20–30% of left thoracic curves harbor occult neuroaxial abnormalities (Chiari I malformation, syringomyelia, or spinal cord tumors) that require neurosurgical decompression prior to any corrective spinal intervention.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
ScoliosisKyphosisLordosisSpinal CurvaturesSpineBone DevelopmentRadiographyClassification
⭐

Why this chapter matters

Two spinal curves with identical Cobb angles on a coronal radiograph can exhibit completely different natural histories, progression risks, and treatment requirements depending on vertebral rotation, skeletal maturity, and underlying neuroaxial pathology. This chapter establishes the fundamental vocabulary and conceptual framework of spinal deformity, preventing clinicians from reducing 3D deformities to isolated 2D angles, identifying red-flag atypical curve patterns, and establishing the baseline necessary for advanced deformity chapters.

“Spinal deformities are complex three-dimensional spatial conditions that must be evaluated beyond simple two-dimensional radiographic Cobb angles. Vertebral morphology, axial rotation, structurality, flexibility, coronal and sagittal spinopelvic balance, and biological skeletal maturity are inseparable components of clinical decision-making. Accurate clinical and radiological characterization separates benign idiopathic curves from syndromic and neuroaxial pathologies, guiding timely bracing or surgical correction.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Core Concept
Deformity is a Three-Dimensional Phenomenon

Scoliosis is not a simple lateral curvature: it combines coronal deviation (Cobb >=10°), axial vertebral rotation (producing the clinical rib hump), and sagittal alterations (thoracic hypokyphosis/lordoscoliosis). True deformity analysis requires 3D evaluation.

🩺
Card 2 — Clinical Decision
Assess Growth Velocity and Risser Sign

Progression risk correlates directly with remaining growth. Patients with Risser 0–2, open triradiate cartilage, and pre-menarchal status face high progression risk, requiring proactive rigid bracing (TLSO) for curves between 20° and 40°.

📐
Card 3 — Key Pearl / Warning
Atypical Left Thoracic Curves Demand MRI

Typical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis presents as a right-sided thoracic curve. A left thoracic curve, severe pain, rapid progression, or asymmetric abdominal reflexes indicates an underlying neuroaxial abnormality (Chiari I, syrinx, tumor), mandating full-spine MRI.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 375-398Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Pudles E, Defino HLA

Pudles E, Defino HLA. Introdução às deformidades da coluna vertebral. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 375-398.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. As referências foram mantidas na mesma ordem e numeração apresentadas no capítulo. A apresentação foi uniformizada segundo o padrão Vancouver quando os elementos disponíveis permitiram, sem completar informações ausentes por suposição.
2. Dickson RA. Idiopathic scoliosis: foundation for physiological treatment. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69(3):89-96.
3. Martins SCM, Mystro S, Veiga IG, Rosa AF, Lima MC, Tebet MA, Pasqualini W, Cavali PTM, Risso Neto MI. Epidemiological portrait of pediatric scoliosis in a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Coluna/Columna. 2023;22(3):e273410.
4. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(7):1061-71.
5. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV. Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(5):702-12.
6. Schlösser TB, Catelein R. The etiologic relevance of 3-D pathoanatomy of adolescent idiophatic scoliosis. Coluna/Columna. 2027;16(4):302-307.
7. Castelein RM, Pasha S, Cheng JC, Dubousset J. Idiopathic scoliosis as a rotatory decompensation of the spine. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(10):1850-1857. doi:10.1002/jbmr.4137.
8. Moliterno LA, Defino MP, Oliveira LF, Martins D, Silva VT, Azevedo GB, Araujo Junior AE, Perini JA. Sagittal misalignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Coluna/Columna. 2024;22:e280051.
9. Newton PO, Wenger DR. Idiopathic scoliosis. Lovell and Winter 1s Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2006.
10. Marks DS, Qaimkhani SA. The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine. 2009;34(17):1751-1755.
11. Zardo EA, Ziegler MS, Serdeira A, Severo CMD, Rech RV, Toffolo PR, Scalco L, Schwanke RC, Augustin CH. Applicability of the Cobb angle measurement in idiophatic scoliosis using scanned imaging. Coluna/Columna. 2017;16(1):22-24.
12. Mazzuia AR, Machado DR, Fukumothi DK, Nunes LF, Tucci Neto C, Jorge HM, Ortiz RT, Mattos CA. Iphone app use to Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does this apply? Coluna/Columna. 2015;14:101-4.
13. Godinho RR, Ueta RH, Curto DD, Martins DE, Wajchenberg M, Puertas EB. Mensuração da curva escoliótica pela técnica de Cobb intraobservadores e interobservadores e sua importância clínica. Coluna/Columna. 2011;10:216-20.
14. Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B. A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:593-607.
15. Greenspan A, Pugh J, Norman A, Norman R. Scoliotic index: a comparative evaluation of methods for the measurement of scoliosis. B Hosp Jt Dis Ort. 1978;39:117-125.
16. Diab K, Sevastik J, Hedlund R, Suliman I. Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb’s method, by Ferguson’s method and by a new method. Eur Spine J. 1995;4:291-295.
17. Chen YL, Chen WJ, Chiou WK. An alternative method for measuring scoliosis curvature. Orthopedics-New Jersey. 2007;30(10):828.
18. Newton PO, O’Brien MF, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR, Dickson RA, Harms J, editors. Idiopatic scoliosis: the Harms Study Group Treatment guide. New York: Thieme; 2010.
19. Lechner R, Putzer D, Dammerer D, Liebensteiner M, Bach C, Thaler M. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Int Orthop. 2017;41:957-62.
20. Nault ML, Mac-Thiong JM, Roy-Beaudry M, de Guise J, Labelle H, Parent S. Three-dimensional spine parameters can differentiate between progressive and nonprogressive patients with AIS at the initial visit: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(6):618-23.
21. DiMeglio A, Canavese F, Charles YP. Growth and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: when and how much? J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(1 Suppl):S28-36. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e318202c25d. Erratum in: J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(2):221.
22. Diméglio A, Charles YP, Daures JP, de Rosa V, Kaboré B. Accuracy of the Sauvegrain method in determining skeletal age during puberty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1689-96.
23. Sanders JO, Khoury JG, Kishan S, Browne RH, Mooney JF 3rd, Arnold KD, McConnell SJ, Bauman JA, Finegold DN. Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(3):540-53.
24. Sanders JO, Little DG, Richards BS. Prediction of the crankshaft phenomenon by peak height velocity. Spine. 1997;22(12):1352-6.
25. Tanner JM, Whhitehouse RH. Height Standart Chart. Castlemead: Creaseys; 1975.
26. Alshamrani K, Messina F, Offiah AC. Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas applicable to all ethnicities? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2910-2923.
27. Cheh G, Lenke LG, Lehman Jr RA, Kim YJ, Nunley R, Bridwell KH. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32(24):2668-2672.
28. Garcia AS, Vieira FA, Kruppa JTP, Ueta RHS, Puertas EB. Comparison between radiographic methods of measuring flexibility in scoliosis. Coluna/Columna. 2021;20(2):84-88.
29. Howard JJ, Sees JP, Shrader MW. Management of spinal deformity in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop Soc North Am. 2019;1(1):8.
30. Rezende RM, Barbosa IC, Batista DMB, Rezende PR. Auxilio da tomografia computadorizada no planejamento pré-operatório de pacientes portadores de escoliose idiopática do adolescente. Coluna/Columna. 2010;9:85-89.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques