Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 35
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 4 • Spinal Deformities
Chapter35

Adult Scoliosis

Vancouver: Cristante AF, Aragão VAS, Perini DD📖 Pages: 481-486
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 4Spinal Deformities
Cap. 35Clinical Chapter
3authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Adult scoliosis (AS) encompasses coronal spinal deformities in the skeletally mature spine and may arise from progressive de novo degeneration of a previously straight spine, progression of pre-existing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis into adulthood, or secondary etiologies. With global population aging, its clinical significance is expanding rapidly, primarily because the deformity frequently associates with chronic back pain, radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication, loss of global trunk balance, and profound functional disability. In degenerative de novo scoliosis, the process initiates through asymmetric disc and facet joint degeneration, driving vertebral rotatory subluxation, laterolisthesis, and spinal canal stenosis. In adult idiopathic scoliosis, age-related degeneration superimposes on pre-existing structural curves, typically inducing loss of lumbar lordosis. Rather than focusing solely on the coronal Cobb angle, the chapter highlights that sagittal spinopelvic alignment is the dominant determinant of pain, disability, and reconstructive strategy.
• Chapter Objective: To present the foundational principles for recognizing, classifying, and managing adult scoliosis. The reader will differentiate degenerative de novo from adult idiopathic and secondary deformities, correlate symptoms with coronal, sagittal, and neural pathologies, perform comprehensive full-spine spinopelvic assessments, utilize the Aebi and SRS-Schwab classifications, and understand the core principles governing conservative therapy, surgical indications, multiplanar realignment, neural decompression, and complication prevention.
• Two distinct deformity trajectoriesDegenerative de novo scoliosis develops in patients without a prior history of scoliosis. Asymmetric disc collapse alters segmental stability and transfers uneven loads across facet joints, inducing rotatory subluxation, lateral listhesis, and foraminal stenosis. Adult idiopathic scoliosis represents the progression of pre-existing adolescent curves into maturity, where superimposed degenerative changes exacerbate structural deformities and flatten lumbar lordosis. Aebi's etiological classification organizes these curves into primary degenerative, progressive idiopathic, and secondary forms.
• Sagittal alignment and clinical disabilityAxial back pain is the most frequent symptom, related to muscle fatigue and facet arthrosis. Radiculopathy and neurogenic claudication stem from degenerative stenosis and neuroforaminal compromise. The chapter underscores that sagittal malalignment correlates much more strongly with pain and disability than coronal asymmetry. Positive sagittal imbalance forces substantial muscular compensation and increases energy expenditure during standing and walking. Figure 35.1 illustrates the clinical assessment of trunk imbalance and compensatory mechanisms.
• Comprehensive radiographic spinopelvic assessmentFull-spine standing radiographs are essential, evaluating the spine and pelvis as an integrated kinetic chain. Beyond coronal curve magnitude, regional curves and sagittal parameters are systematically quantified. Figure 35.3 details core spinopelvic parameters: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). The SRS-Schwab classification (Figure 35.4) combines coronal curve patterns with three validated sagittal modifiers (PI-LL mismatch, pelvic tilt, and SVA), providing a standardized framework linked directly to health-related quality of life.
• Conservative managementInitial therapy incorporates physical rehabilitation, core stabilization, low-impact exercise, multimodal pharmacotherapy, and targeted image-guided spinal injections. The efficacy of bracing remains limited in adult deformity. Conservative management aims to control pain and optimize function, recognizing that it does not reverse structural bony deformity.
• Surgical principles and realignmentSurgical indication is highly individualized and warranted for intractable disabling pain, progressive neurological deficits, incapacitating claudication, or severe global malalignment. Unlike adolescent surgery, adult reconstructive goals are functional: decompressing neural structures, relieving mechanical pain, and restoring an age-appropriate spinopelvic alignment. Reconstructions range from targeted focal decompression to extensive multi-level fusions with corrective osteotomies (Figures 35.5 and 35.6).
• Clinical Application: In clinical practice, evaluation must begin with identifying the primary symptom driving disability: axial mechanical pain, radicular pain, neurogenic claudication, or postural fatigue while standing. Clinical examination in bipedal stance evaluates global posture, pelvic retroversion, knee flexion, and detailed neurological function. Full-spine standing radiographs must encompass hips and femoral heads. The SRS-Schwab classification structures this analysis, highlighting the degree of sagittal compensation (PI-LL mismatch and pelvic tilt). Conservative care is the first-line approach for most patients. When surgery is considered, surgical goals must balance structural correction against physiological risk. Patient age, comorbidities, bone mineral density (DEXA and Hounsfield unit assessment), nutritional status, and smoking history dictate feasibility. Untreated osteoporosis substantially increases hardware pullout and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK/PJF). Reconstructive alignment targets should be age-adjusted, avoiding overcorrection in elderly patients while providing adequate lordosis and horizontal gaze. In medically frail patients with predominantly radicular symptoms, focal decompression or limited MIS interbody fusion may achieve clinical goals without the high morbidity of extensive deformity fusions.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
ScoliosisSpinal CurvaturesAdultLow Back PainSpinal StenosisSpinal FusionOsteotomyOsteoporosis
⭐

Why this chapter matters

In adult scoliosis, two patients with identical 40° lumbar Cobb angles can present completely different clinical profiles. One may remain well-compensated and pain-free, while the other suffers from severe sagittal collapse, debilitating radiculopathy, and inability to stand. This chapter demonstrates why evaluation must look past the coronal Cobb angle and prioritize pelvic parameters, sagittal balance, neural status, and medical comorbidities. This perspective prevents both overoperating on compensated patients and performing insufficient decompressions that destabilize unaligned spines.

“Adult scoliosis is far more than a coronal curve in an aging spine. Pain, neural compression, disc degeneration, loss of lordosis, and spinopelvic malalignment interact to cause disability. Treatment must originate from patient symptoms and functional limitations, using global sagittal balance to guide reconstruction while balancing operative risks against quality-of-life benefits. Radiographic realignment is a means to restore function, not an isolated end in itself.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Core Concept
Sagittal Alignment Outweighs Coronal Magnitude

In adult deformity, disability correlates poorly with coronal curve size. Loss of lumbar lordosis, positive sagittal imbalance, and pelvic retroversion drive back pain, fatigue, and functional decline. Comprehensive evaluation must integrate full-spine spinopelvic parameters.

🩺
Card 2 — Clinical Decision
Treat Symptoms, Not Radiographs

Surgical indication arises from intractable pain, neural compression, or disabling imbalance, not an arbitrary Cobb threshold. Deformity correction must be balanced against patient age, comorbidities, and surgical morbidity to achieve realistic functional gains.

📐
Card 3 — Pearl / Alert
Bone Quality Dictates Construct Survival

Osteopenia and osteoporosis represent critical failure risks in adult deformity surgery. Assessing bone density, optimizing metabolic bone health, and utilizing augmentative fixation strategies preoperatively are vital to prevent proximal junctional failure and screw pullout.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 481-486Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Cristante AF, Aragão VAS, Perini DD

Cristante AF, Aragão VAS, Perini DD. Escoliose do adulto. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 481-486.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(10):925-48.
2. Nasri F. O envelhecimento populacional no Brasil Einstein. 2008;6(Supl 1):S4-S6.
3. Bess S, Line B, Fu KM, McCarthy I, Lafage V, Schwab F, et al. The health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity: comparison of deformity types to United States population norms and chronic diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(3):224-33.
4. Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O, Zhu F, Rothenfluh DA, Paulino CB, et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):160-72.
5. Youssef JA, Orndorff DO, Patty CA, Scott MA, Price HL, Hamlin LF, et al. Current status of adult spinal deformity. Global Spine J. 2013;3(1):51-62.
6. Kadow T, Sowa G, Vo N, Kang JD. Molecular basis of intervertebral disc degeneration and herniations: what are the important translational questions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):1903-12.
7. York PJ, Kim HJ. Degenerative scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):547-58.
8. Liyew WA. Clinical presentations of lumbar disc degeneration and lumbosacral nerve lesions. Int J Rheumatol. 2020;2020:2919625.
9. Marty-Poumarat C, Scattin L, Marpeau M, Garreau de Loubresse C, Aegerter P. Natural history of progressive adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(11):1227-35.
10. Cunha MK, Silva LT, Hostt LPO, Alves WG, Gomes IS. Mecanismos neurológicos envolvidos na escoliose idiopática revisão sistemática da literatura. Arch Health [Internet]. 2024;5(3):e1720.
11. Benoist M. Natural history of the aging spine. Eur Spine J. 2003;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S86-S89.
12. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):2224-31.
13. Shapiro GS, Taira G, Boachie-Adjei O. Results of surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain and spinal stenosis: a study of long-term clinical radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(4):358-63.
14. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(18):2024-9.
15. Cho KJ, Kim YT, Shin SH, Suk SI. Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(3):371-81.
16. Pritchett JW, Bortel DT. Degenerative symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(6):700-3.
17. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, et al. Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2186-90.
18. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Fu KM, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the adult spinal deformity patient. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013;24(2):143-56.
19. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(13):E803-12.
20. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(17):1828-33.
21. Somoskeöy S, Tunyogi-Csapó M, Bogyó C, Illés T. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. Spine J. 2012;12(11):1052-9.
22. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(12):1077-82.
23. Lin JD, Osorio JA, Baum GR, Menger RP, Reid PC, Dyrszka MD, et al. A new modular radiographic classification of adult idiopathic scoliosis as an extension of the Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020;8(5):989-997.
24. Ailon T, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, et al. Degenerative spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2015;77 Suppl 4:S75-S91.
25. Haldeman S, Nordin M, Chou R, Côté P, Hurwitz EL, Johnson CD, et al. The Global Spine Care Initiative: World Spine Care executive summary on reducing spine-related disability in low- and middle-income communities. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 6):776-85.
26. DePalma MJ, Slipman CW. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with epidural steroid injections. Spine J. 2008;8(1):45-55.
27. McAviney J, Mee J, Fazalbhoy A, Du Plessis J, Brown BT. A systematic literature review of spinal brace/orthosis treatment for adults with scoliosis between 1967 and 2018: clinical outcomes and harms data. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):87.
28. Sengupta K. Adult spinal deformity. In: Rao RD, Smuck M, editors. Orthopaedic knowledge update: spine. 4th ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2012. p. 349-67.
29. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kang SB, Kim HS, et al. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(17):1595-601.
30. Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(3):E1.
31. Kim W, Porrino JA, Hood KA, Chadaz TS, Klauser AS, Taljanovic MS. Clinical evaluation, imaging, and management of adolescent idiopathic and adult degenerative scoliosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;48(4):402-14.
32. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2-18.
33. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, Demakakos J, Lenke L, Tropiano P, et al. The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(1):112-20.
34. Uribe JS, Schwab F, Mundis GM, Xu DS, Januszewski J, Kanter AS, et al. The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(5):565-75.
35. Park SJ, Park JS, Kang DH, Lim YM, Lee CS. Self-image perception as a key determinant of long-term patient satisfaction following adult spinal deformity surgery. Global Spine J. 2025;21925682251334984.
36. Sun X, Huang J, Wang W, Gan L, Cao L, Liu Y, et al. How to view the effectiveness of spinal deformity surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis in octogenarian population? A comprehensive analysis and judgment. Neurosurg Rev. 2025;48(1):378.
37. Zhang Q, Chen Z, Lin Y, Zhang X, Wu W, Liang Y. The role of robot-assisted technique in treating adult degenerative scoliosis with circumferential minimal invasive correction surgery - a retrospective analysis of 51 consecutive cases. Orthop Res Rev. 2025;17:189-98.
38. Sansur CA, Smith JS, Coe JD, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Polly Jr DW, et al. Scoliosis Research Society morbidity and mortality of adult scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(9):E593-7.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques