Home›The Treatise›Chapters›Chapter 65
Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral
SECTION 8 • Surgical Techniques
Chapter65

POSTERIOR CERVICAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY

Vancouver: Del Curto D, Vaz GN, Schussel VC, Jorge TF📖 Pages: 845-852
Full reading of this chapter is available exclusively in the printed edition of the Treatise.
Sec. 8Surgical Techniques
Cap. 65Clinical Chapter
4authors
Português
Español
English
Referênciasscientific citations
📑

Chapter Summary

• Context: Posterior cervical endoscopic surgery developed as a motion-preserving, minimally invasive alternative to open foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in selected patients. Its primary clinical attraction is achieving targeted radicular or central canal decompression while completely preserving segment motion and minimizing disruption to posterior cervical musculature. The approach is particularly suited for lateral or foraminal disc herniations and bony foraminal stenosis without segmental instability. Techniques such as 'over-the-top' laminotomy have expanded the ability to decompress the contralateral canal and lateral recess from a unilateral entry, while unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) systems enhance instrumental triangulation. However, the close proximity of the cervical spinal cord, exiting nerve roots, and vertebral artery, combined with a narrow working space and continuous fluid pressure, makes the procedure unforgiving. Severe myelopathy, gross instability, fixed kyphosis, and extensive OPLL remain scenarios where conventional open techniques provide greater safety.
• Chapter Objective: Equip the reader to evaluate when the posterior cervical endoscopic approach is indicated, plan the trajectory according to compressive topography, and understand the technical differences between uniportal, biportal, and over-the-top strategies. The chapter emphasizes critical safety criteria for facet preservation, neurovascular protection, fluid pressure control, and indications for open conversion.
• Selecting the posterior cervical corridorThe posterior approach is primarily targeted at posterolateral and foraminal nerve root compressions. In selected central stenosis, over-the-top laminotomy allows bilateral canal unroofing through a unilateral corridor. Biportal systems provide independent instrument manipulation. Diffuse multi-level cord compression, severe cervical myelopathy, extensive OPLL, frank segmental instability, or fixed kyphosis require caution and favor conventional anterior or open posterior techniques.
• Preoperative planningHigh-resolution MRI and CT are essential. MRI evaluates the disc, nerve root, spinal cord, and compressive pathology; CT details facet osteophytes, uncinate overgrowth, and the exact boundaries for bony resection. Positioning with head fixation in Mayfield clamp or halo, choice of endoscope optics (0° vs 30°), and portal triangulation depend on uniportal versus biportal technique. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (MEP/SSEP) is recommended when working near the cord.
• Foraminotomy and decompression techniqueThe uniportal approach identifies the 'V-point' at the laminofacet junction. Progressive unroofing of the medial facet and lateral lamina is performed with diamond burrs and micro-punches. The golden rule is preserving at least 50% to 70% of the facet joint to prevent postoperative instability. Decompression is complete when the nerve root is completely free, mobile, and visualized traversing the foramen. The vertebral artery marks the extreme lateral safety boundary.
• Expanded techniquesThe over-the-top technique angles the working channel across the base of the spinous process to decompress the contralateral thecal sac and lateral recess. In biportal systems, viewing and working portals operate independently, facilitating high-speed drilling and micro-instrumentation.
• Outcomes and complicationsThe chapter reports clinical outcomes and pain relief comparable to ACDF and open microforaminotomy, with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and preserved motion. Figures 65.1 through 65.4 demonstrate cases of foraminal radiculopathy and central stenosis treated by over-the-top endoscopy. Complications include dural tears, transient C5/C6 root neuropraxia, epidural hematoma, recurrence, and vertebral artery injury. Knowing when to convert to open surgery during uncontrolled venous bleeding or large dural lacerations is a mark of surgical mastery.
• Clinical Application: For unilateral radiculopathy caused by a soft foraminal disc herniation or lateral osteophyte, the posterior endoscopic route enables targeted decompression with full motion preservation, provided baseline cervical alignment is lordotic and stable. Central stenosis with myelopathy requires strict evaluation of the number of levels and canal reserve. Preoperative CT must calculate exactly how much medial facet bone needs removal without violating the 50% stability threshold. The vertebral artery's location must be visualized on axial CT/MRI before extending foraminotomy laterally. Intraoperatively, cloudy visualization must never be managed with blind instrument probing or excessive irrigation pump pressure; the surgeon must re-establish clear anatomical landmarks and meticulous radiofrequency coagulation. The initial learning curve should be limited to soft posterolateral single-level herniations in stable, lordotic spines before progressing to complex stenoses.
🏷️

Keywords

Preferred DeCS/MeSH Descriptors:
EndoscopyCervical VertebraeRadiculopathySpinal StenosisIntervertebral Disc DisplacementMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative Complications
⭐

Why this chapter matters

Preserving cervical motion while achieving complete radicular decompression is an appealing surgical goal. Posterior endoscopy achieves this balance without the fusion-related risks of adjacent segment disease or pseudoarthrosis. However, this advantage exists only when pathology matches a safe posterior corridor. This chapter guides clinicians in distinguishing situations where minimal invasiveness provides superior outcomes from those where narrow corridors or cord myelopathy make open surgery mandatory.

“Posterior cervical endoscopy provides focal decompression with motion preservation in carefully selected patients. Its safety depends on exact anatomical planning, sufficient yet limited facet resection, minimal thecal manipulation, and respect for lateral vertebral artery boundaries. Over-the-top and biportal techniques expand possibilities, but do not replace the judgment of when open surgery is safer.”
✨

Chapter Highlights

🌐
Card 1 — Motion Can Be Fully Preserved
Motion-preserving foraminotomy

Posterior endoscopic foraminotomy relieves radiculopathy without sacrificing segment mobility or requiring fusion hardware. This advantage requires preoperative lordotic stability and strictly limited (<50%) facet resection.

🩺
Card 2 — Topography Dictates the Corridor
Anterior vs posterior approach

Foraminal and posterolateral soft compressions favor the posterior route. Diffuse anterior osteophytic bars, fixed kyphosis, or severe multi-level myelopathy favor anterior decompression and reconstruction.

📐
Card 3 — Know When to Convert to Open
Open conversion safety

Converting to open surgery represents sound judgment, not technical failure. Uncontrolled bleeding obscuring the field, large dural tears, or lost anatomical orientation warrant widening the surgical exposure.

📑

How to Cite this Chapter (Vancouver Format)

Official bibliographic indexing and citation guidelines
📖 Pages: 845-852Vancouver Style
Authors (Vancouver):Del Curto D, Vaz GN, Schussel VC, Jorge TF

Del Curto D, Vaz GN, Schussel VC, Jorge TF. Endoscopia na coluna cervical pela via posterior. In: Pudles E, Defino H, Risso M, editors. Tratado de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral (Treatise of Spine Surgery). 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Dilivros Editora; 2026. p. 845-852.

ISBN: 978-85-8053-292-0 • 1.ª Edição • Dilivros Editora
📚

Bibliographic References

1. Huang CC, Fitts J, Huie D, Bhowmick DA, Abd-El-Barr MM. Evolution of cervical endoscopic spine surgery: current progress and future directions — a narrative review. Glob Spine J. 2024;13(7):2122. doi:10.3390/jcm13072122.
2. O’Toole JE, Sheikh H, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG, Perez-Cruet MJ. Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006;17(4):411-22.
3. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(9):940-8.
4. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic anterior decompression versus conventional anterior decompression and fusion in cervical disc herniations. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1677-82.
5. Kwon B, Moon A. Advances in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery: a comprehensive review of the techniques used for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations and spinal stenosis and lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2025:S1529-9430(25)00302-X.
6. Bergamaschi JPM, de Brito MBS, Araújo FF, et al. Surgical technique of central and over-the-top full-endoscopic decompression of the cervical spine: a technical note. J Pers Med. 2023;13(10):1508.
7. Heo DH, Ha JS, Jang JW, et al. Biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy for adjacent 2-level foraminal lesions using a single approach (sliding technique). Neurospine. 2023;20(1):92-98.
8. Jung SB, Kim N. Biportal endoscopic spine surgery for cervical disk herniation: a technical note and preliminary report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(27):e2975.
9. Ahn J, Lee H, Choi D, Lee K. Extraforaminal biportal endoscopic approach for transforaminal decompression (cervical). J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(5):492-8.
10. Liu Y, Kim JS, Lee MG, Cha JY. Full-endoscopy with intraoperative O-arm navigation for cervicothoracic gas-containing hemorrhagic synovial cyst: a case report. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022;11:100133.
11. Lohre R, Wang JC, Lewandrowski KU, Goel DP. Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(Suppl 1):S208-23.
12. Wu ZP, Wei ZY, Song XL. Comparison of efficacy between endoscope-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and open ACDF in the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):35.
Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis
Scheduled Premiere
Exclusive Premiere • Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
Wednesday, October 07 at 9:00 PM (BRT)
The live countdown will be activated on the eve of the premiere.

The full videocast will premiere automatically in this player on Wednesday, 10/07 at 6:00 PM (BRT).

Also premiering on Spotify
Treatise in Debate

Official videocast derived from the treatise chapters.

Episode 06 – Early-Onset Scoliosis

Lungs and the Growing Spine: thoracic development, C-EOS classification, and growth-friendly surgical techniques